New york city. Did her political gamble pay off . What new polls are telling us about Kamala Harris risky strategy to challenge Donald Trump not where he is weakest but where he is strongest . Could it put her over the top in Mustwin Pennsylvania . Fighting hate with love. A pastor from springfield, ohio, trying to shepherd his community through a political and cultural firestorm. He will join me to explain what he thinks he needs what he thinks needs to happen now. Israeli fighter Jets Pound Hezbollah targets as Terrorist Leaders declare the blast linked to handheld devices a declaration of war. We have a top Military Analyst standing by. We begin with a new poll indicating Donald Trump may be losing ground to Kamala Harris on critical issues in critical states. Michigan, pennsylvania and Wisconsin Voters say trump leads on the economy, but its between two and four points. Harris has closed the gap on immigration. Only trumps Sevenpoint Lead in wisconsin is outside the margin of error
corporations could still deny women contraception. he said it could be like assisting others in evil. he wrote that religion helps people decide the degree to which those who assist others in committing wrongful conduct themselves bear moral culpability. that obamacare case may be gorsuch s most well-known decision on anything touching politics. and then finally, there are decisions you ll rarely hear about on tv but they ve cut to the heart of our economic angst in the country right now, like this story of a man who was stuckn a broke down truck in subzero weather waiting for his employer s repairman to show up. after two hours with no help, losing feeling in his limbs, he left the truck to get help. the company fired him for abandoning the property and he sued. he wrote that the law does not give employees the right to
religious freedom rights under the religious freedom restoration act? they say this is not a burden, if the government doesn t require you do provide health insurance, it s not a burden. or they could open up the door for companies saying i don t want to comply with all kinds of laws because they violate the boss s religious freedom. we could see women who work for those companies in particular because women s health care is so controversial, having a different set of earned benefits than people elsewhere. dahlia, what do you make of that? what s your take on this case? is irin right, that they could potentially open the door to not just corporations like hobby lobby denying women contraception, but denying anything they think is against their religion? everything that irin said i agree with. i think one possibility, and you could see this playing out in oral argument is the court tries to figure some narrower way to constrain this ruling so it doesn t on the one hand force corpora
matter, you cannot adhere to private theological justifications of essentially what is either a public policy or a constitutional matter. if the government thinks that is a compelling interest to get more people contraception there are les intrusive ways to get women contraception. this is obviously not the least intrusive possible way. this is what the case law points to. and one of the things that s really important that they are going to come to in this case, is what would be a less intrusive way of offering contraception. some are arguing that some should provide the contraception. while we hear this type of argument from tim, at the same time we find conservative lawmakers cutting back on funding for things like title
right now we have an example where a catholic teaching, that sex, family, marriage, love, belong together. that is the idea between the catholic opposition to contraception. or in the hobby lobby case. the morning after pill can end a human life before implantation or even at implantation to end a human life. that theology, that does not matter, you cannot adhere to private theological justifications of essentially what is either a public policy or a constitutional matter. if the government thinks that is a compelling interest to get more people contraception there are less intrusive ways to get women contraception. this is obviously not the least intrusive possible way. this is what the case law points to. and one of the things that s really important that they are