religious freedom rights under the religious freedom restoration act? they say this is not a burden, if the government doesn t require you do provide health insurance, it s not a burden. or they could open up the door for companies saying i don t want to comply with all kinds of laws because they violate the boss s religious freedom. we could see women who work for those companies in particular because women s health care is so controversial, having a different set of earned benefits than people elsewhere. dahlia, what do you make of that? what s your take on this case? is irin right, that they could potentially open the door to not just corporations like hobby lobby denying women contraception, but denying anything they think is against their religion? everything that irin said i agree with. i think one possibility, and you could see this playing out in oral argument is the court tries to figure some narrower way to constrain this ruling so it doesn t on the one hand force corpora