Police training and protocol its important to keep in mind that i ruled that the officer violated our core value of competence and i fired. Ph jobs to assess criminality going up there are not going to. Have to live up to. And i was very surprised to have the decision to terminate christopher a manny didnt relate to the shooting it only related to the fact that he felt that the path down search was improper. That the chief made the decision based on this officer not following procedures that are to move the ending. And i think that was a good decision. But he still has offices to face crime. Good evening ladies and gentlemen our Police Commissioner im here today on behalf of my police. I resent the eligibility of the appointment to Police Officers who stand here before you as a diverse not proud of the chiefs actions i think the chief was a coward nowhere in this entire nation and certainly not in the city at any officer ever been fired for something called coach considerations. I have
Going to them. And on top of that i. Have to live up to that. And i was very surprised to have the decision to terminate christopher a manny didnt relate to the shooting it only related to the fact that he felt that the after search was improper. That the chief made the decision based on this officer not following procedures and not some of the ending. And i think that was a good decision. But you still want to sausage to Face Criminal Charges 2. Good evening ladies and gentlemen and our Police Commissioner im here today on behalf of my police to present the eligibility of the appointment to Police Officers who stand here before you as a diverse not proud of the chiefs actions i think the chief was a coward. Nowhere in this entire nation and certainly not in the city at any officer ever been fired for something called coach considerations. I have been pleading that our officers need to work in jail should we any have band with another officer maybe it would have never happened because
Was decided 54. Well hear argument next in case mitchell versus wisconsin. Mr. Hinkle. Mr. Chief justice, state advances bold and novel proposition here. Simply by an enacting a statute that its citizens have consented to aer is. Thats a blood draw, no reason that similar statutes couldnt been enacted in all others. Or, consent to an officer scrolling through a persons cell phone. This court has never approved a search on the theory that a search consent be deemed by operational of law. Consent is a question of fact. It doesnt strike me immediately is that horrendous to allow officers to look, not through the cell phone but calls, to find out, was this person calling somebody or taking to somebody at the time they ran over somebody else . Is that so obviously i dont know is that so clearly they couldnt do . Well, i dont know if its an equally intrusive sr. Ch as to a blood draw. Once we accept that these simple existence of a statute can provide consent that reasonableness doesnt enter
Hulse, the author of the book confirmation bias inside washingtons war over the Supreme Court, from scalias death to justice kavanaugh. Good sunday morning. Thank you for being with us. On the sundaynews morning. The president traveling to south korea crossing into north korea briefly, meeting for nearly an hour with chairman kim jongun. Guest that was a big moment for the president. The symbolism is what they were seeking. This is something that has been in the works for this trip. It may look impromptu, but it is not impromptu. It was a big step. The president really wanted this. Hes got problems in iran, and he needs to make sure his other problems are under control. It looks like they are going to talks. The i guess it is a small version of nixon goes to china. Host peter baker is writing this morning, President Trump stepping across a low concrete market 3 40 six local time and walked 20 steps to the base of a building on the north korean side for an encounter on television, and u
28 states have laws similar to wisconsins. Here is aprils one hour opening argument in the case. Mitchell versus wisconsin. Mr. Hinkel. Mr. Hinkel mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court the state advances a bold and novel proposition here, that it can excuse itself from the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement simply by enacting a statute saying that some of its that its citizens have consented to a search. Here, that search is a blood draw, but theres no reason that similar statutes couldnt be enacted to authorize all manner of other searches. For example, a state could declare that driving on its roads constitutes consent to the installation of a gps tracking device on a persons vehicle, or consent to an officer scrolling through a persons cell phone if they happen to be stopped. Now this court has never approved a search on the theory that that a search that consent can be deemed by operation of law. And thats because, under schneckloth, consent is a question of fact. Chief