report by the iaea on the plan to discharge the treated water from the fukushima nuclear power plant. ever since, from the fukushima nuclear power plant. eversince, i from the fukushima nuclear power plant. ever since, i have been continuing my efforts in this regard, including in particular by visiting fukushima, where a number of important things happened. the first, i would say, was for me the opportunity to meet with 11 mayors of the region, of the prefecture there, near the plant. the chamber of commerce, the fishermen association and other local actors and people from the area. i felt that my direct contact with them was indispensable, was something i was keen on doing in order to do what i am doing with you here, but of course, with the added, i would say, ingredient of this being in contact with the people at the first lines of impact of whatever we do there. what happened in march 2011 there and the subsequent actions that have been taken by the japanese government f
this was a shocking disaster when it happened back in 2011 and there has been a lot of concern injapan and also of course in south korea as to what happens next. do you think these comments, this press conference, all the information regarding will start to allay some of those concerns? it’s some of those concerns? it s very difficult some of those concerns? it s very difficult to some of those concerns? it s very difficult to talbot from wiping hearing from people and fukushima for example, you get the feeling that what happens with the science, what happens with the science, what happens with governmental briefings, what happens in terms of all the research and studies that are regulated and that have now been endorsed by the iaea, giving their own assessment saying that this is scientifically sound, this is safe, guy had, will have negligible radiological effects on people and the environment, that doesn t seem to be translating to the ground, to the general public weather her