back and wasn t worried about being upbeat and gentle yet kind but strong. she was herself. there is a difference for women in power versus an every day person or a man. she had to be this woman, wasn t shrill, who wasn t trying to be boisterous or some people when you go to the polls this is what she was listening to from those. same way she had to attack. she was faced with those women that bill clinton had issues with. that would have been a big problem. she had to play it down the line. i have had my reasons are as good for staying as yours is for leaving. if you have a bullet just hit it where it hurts. i want to get back to this
meeting in july when donald trump held that press conference where he invited the russians to come in and hack hillary clinton s e-mail so that those 30,000 missing e-mails could be exposed. so we do know certain things around this. again, we don t know the we know the timeline. we only have one side of the story, and only donald trump jr. s public statements. unfortunately for him, he s going to have to go, very likely, almost definitely, going to have to go under oath in some way, shape or form whether a congressional committee or special council. and don t forget. jared kushner after they won the election was meeting with another russian, sergey, who wasn t told who he was meeting with either. all of the meetings with people who were acquaintances of acquaintances, just happened to be russians? i think we need a little more of an explanation. certainly do. everybody, thanks very much.
though he got ahead of himself. julie and i are in the same boat. we both love the law. it is, as she was income a layman s terms. when i look injustice or it, he was involved in the planned parenthood case, as well. someone who was appointed by the former president, who wasn t just appointed by the former president, but he also bundled money for him, too. the reason i bring that up, the leeway, i seem to think he would give someone like a democrat if there was a democrat in the white house instead of a republican. he said specifically in this that he was looking at what trump had tweeted and thinks he had said and he was using that as part of his interpretation of this, which to me seems a little bit over the top. furthermore, he can say that this is ultimately something that the executive the white house can t weigh in here,
deductions increasing by a dramatic amount in terms of what you can take off your taxable income right off the bat. that is got to make people happy across the board. you did hear criticisms today that this is swayed toward people who have the most benefits are the people with the most money. do you agree? i don t know because we haven t seen a plan. martha: we have seen the tax bracket. we have seen the deductions. the death taxes going away. the charitable tax will stay. i think there are a couple of challenges here. yes, a lot of democrats will rightfully point to the fact that this does disproportionately help the people with more money. they will keep raising questions about the president s tax returns and see how much he benefits. that is one side. the other side, you are beginning to hear grumbling from republicans on the hill who are saying, look, and principal, we agree with the brackets, but how are you going to pay for this? if you don t have some sort of
official, who wasn t named in those reports? he came forward and he said that he was the one who suggested any kind of deal. i m the one who threw that out there, he told the new york times. and second, it was no big deal, this former fbi agent disputed he had ever characterized his conversations with the state owe department official as a quid pro quo. that s a reach, i said hey, what s this about, listen, there was no collusion, there was absolutely no collusion. no story, nothing to see here, no cow lose, that s a reach. damage was done. three straight days of quid pro quo, flashing red light of criminality, coverup. damage was done, well done. apparently now we know it was well paid. because now we have a new revelation about this story. last week the former national security adviser to the president filed some new federal paperwork, mike flynn registered retroactively as a foreign agent, admitting he took paid work as lobbyist for the interests of the turkish government during