We invited you thirty days ago youre not the defendant in this case your agenda continues to assert you are youre the plaintiffs in this case. Which im sure even commissioner hayon living in the richmond understands the difference between plaintiffs and independents. Commissioner keane last month wanted to quickly move to ignore deputy City Attorney whites advise to postpone it for a month. Commissioner keane according to the audit wanted to jump into an open session on the spot i believe it struck me then and now to the extent commissioner keane elected to attempt to ignore deputy City Attorney josh whites City Attorney advise. Found it like appoints to the Sunshine Task force. Where supervisor tang is using a witness test of undying loyalty to City Attorney advise. So if commissioner keane can ignore whites advise why cant the Sunshine Task force who overall had reached a simple interpretation of City Attorney advise. As many city policy bodies often do during open session they found
This truly is pending litigation and i think it would be, you know, possible to provide, you know, full and frank advise to the commission about that pending litigation in open session. Is there a motion to going go into closed session. Before we go into closed session i think at our last meeting we said weigh to explain why you should understand that when we are considering whether or not a complaint should be filed with the individual the individual has been informed he or she knows were intending to discuss that matter if after in our closed session we determine that no complaints should be filed she or he has a right to the privacy so its like any kind of a Legal Process the government and the District Attorney when it initiates a public investigation they dont go to the public so see he or she has compliment a crime thats an invasion of the their privacy the only reason in private if we decide that, yes theres probable cause it then gets disclosed and theres will be a public heari
I was glad to hear commissioner renne raise the same southern i had over what a private citizen sending a single email to the 11 board of supervisors that constitutes a lobbyist violation where youre going down a slirp opening that door for instance, if i send all 11 supervisors a single email on a tuesday claiming that the in effect executive director had withheld the entire case in mr. Gross mans lawsuit and you only got the appellant portion would i be sued of being a lobbyist because of the court case. What about on the next day i sent a different email to all 11 supervisors . Say over bicyclists on the sidewalk in my neighborhood would that be considered lobbying. Actually, im only writing about my pedestrian safety. You need to urge the mayor to send that legislation back to the supervisor chiu and make sure its clear that the 5 contact limitation will not apply to private citizens commissioner renne. Because when i first look at it that was my immediate concern i havent seen any
Guys have problem with that coalitions. One audit what size of a needle in the haystack is that. I was glad to hear commissioner renne raise the same southern i had over what a private citizen sending a single email to the 11 board of supervisors that constitutes a lobbyist violation where youre going down a slirp opening that door for instance, if i send all 11 supervisors a single email on a tuesday claiming that the in effect executive director had withheld the entire case in mr. Gross mans lawsuit and you only got the appellant portion would i be sued of being a lobbyist because of the court case. What about on the next day i sent a different email to all 11 supervisors . Say over bicyclists on the sidewalk in my neighborhood would that be considered lobbying. Actually, im only writing about my pedestrian safety. You need to urge the mayor to send that legislation back to the supervisor chiu and make sure its clear that the 5 contact limitation will not apply to private citizens co
Constitutes a lobbyist violation where youre going down a slirp opening that door for instance, if i send all 11 supervisors a single email on a tuesday claiming that the in effect executive director had withheld the entire case in mr. Gross mans lawsuit and you only got the appellant portion would i be sued of being a lobbyist because of the court case. What about on the next day i sent a different email to all 11 supervisors . Say over bicyclists on the sidewalk in my neighborhood would that be considered lobbying. Actually, im only writing about my pedestrian safety. You need to urge the mayor to send that legislation back to the supervisor chiu and make sure its clear that the 5 contact limitation will not apply to private citizens commissioner renne. Because when i first look at it that was my immediate concern i havent seen any of the amendments that were tweaked but that needs to be crystal clear. Citizens have every right to petition their government and not be misconstrued as