Mastro, an assistant professor of Security Studies at the edmund a. Wilson school at Georgetown University and american scholar at American Enterprise institute. Shes the author of the cost of conversation, obstacles to peace talks in wartime. And she is currently working on a book about chans challenges to u. S. Primacy. Next we hear from a senior fellow at Hudson Institute and adjunct senior fellow at the center for new American Security and president and ceo of solarium llc, a defense consulting firm. Hes previously served as president of the center for strategic and budgetary assessments in a department of Defenses Office of net assessment and on the personal staff of three secretaries of defense. Hes the author of several books, most recently publishing the declines of deterrents earlier this year. Our third panelist is dr. Michael green who is a Senior Vice President for asia and japan chair at the center for strategic and International Studies csis as well as director of Asian S
Waving at everyone. Ive got white papers shes also raking in the fundraising money, but she may have made one colossal error. Nbc news saying warren has been quietly consulting with, what happened . Hillary clinton. Yeah, getting advice on how to win the white house for the candidate whos blown it worse than anybody else ever. And why on earth would she want hillarys help unless she wants pointers on how to bleach an email server or how to gracefully fall down a flight or stairs or how to fill a basket of deplorables. Many political analysts have said Hillary Clinton is a toxic asset because of her spectacular 201 implosion. 2016 implosion. Her husband also said to be persona non grata because of his past behavior and, of course, the me too movement. Will joe biden be able to capitalize on this chaos . We will know thursday when he squares off with warren for the very first time. They have not shared a debate stage yet and biden, of course, did not perform well during that very boring
Waving at everyone. Ive got white papers shes also raking in the fundraising money, but she may have made one colossal error. Nbc news saying warren has been quietly consulting with, what happened . Hillary clinton. Yeah, getting advice on how to win the white house for the candidate whos blown it worse than anybody else ever. And why on earth would she want hillarys help unless she wants pointers on how to bleach an email server or how to gracefully fall down a flight or stairs or how to fill a basket of deplorables. Many political analysts have said Hillary Clinton is a toxic asset because of her spectacular 201 implosion. 2016 implosion. Her husband also said to be persona non grata because of his past behavior and, of course, the me too movement. Will joe biden be able to capitalize on this chaos . We will know thursday when he squares off with warren for the very first time. They have not shared a debate stage yet and biden, of course, did not perform well during that very boring
Captioning performed by vitac through our cloudbased shared service platform, its a fed ramped cloud where we get the sensors out for those small and micro agencies and feed that data rather than into individual dashboards at their sites, feed it up into a fed ramped cloud where each agency has their multitenant dashboard. Thats been a great accomplishment for the program in terms of for the first time were getting near realtime visibility of those smaller micro agencies and helping them get the capabilities they need to protect their Critical Mission systems. One of the early wins for the program, once we were getting automated discovery capabilities out to the network, we were able to see on average across the federal government that there were 75 more assets than what were being reported up manually. So from that measurement we want to continue to build on that. Now we have all of this vulnerability information feeding up to the Agency Dashboard summarized up to the federal dashboar
Test. Test. Test. Test. Test. Test. Captioning performed by vitac our allies are taking huge heat for this and if we were to suddenly say you know what, weve decided to change our position on huawei to get a good trade deal, we would obviously undercut them but we would lose that fight in governments that have a National Security impulse to work with us, like britain, but enormous commercial pressure to work with huawei. So, steadiness on this one is really, really critical. If i can just add two points, the first on linking security economics more broadly. I agree with dr. Greens assessment of why that might not be beneficial at this stage, but i think it largely, in my view, depends on whos in the white house. My primary concern about linking economics and security is its my assessment that President Trump prioritizes the Economic Issues with china over the security issues. For example, he has never brought up the South China Sea with xi jingping. The last time i can see he even twee