Obviously the investigators are still trying to figure out what was behind this, who the bomber is. Im told theyve identified a male as the bomber but theyre still trying to learn more about him. What is most striking to you . What was the bomb made out of . Because that leads you to oo lot of conclusions. This is the deadliest Terror Attack since july 7th, 2000 fiv 2005. And almost certainly a Hydrogen Puraukside bomb. Because the signature of al qaeda and isis are these kinds of bombs. So where was it made . Because you need a commercial refrigerator often the store the chemicals. Theyre very toxic if youre making these kinds of bombs, youre oftenb wearing a gas mask. Theres a whole apparatus i would be looking for. We dont know if its a hydrogen
peroxide bomb. Would it be a loan wolf scenario . Or how likely would that be . Im skeptical. Weve had people in this country build those bombs and kill themselves. Its difficult. You need training. Ive been in Bomb Making Courses where it t
A newscast reviewing and analyzing top stories of the day as they happen. Said yes. We expect more detail. Shepard its my understanding there was testimony about a time when Paul Manafort essentially ran out of money. He did. Theyre saying in 2014, when his former top client, who the mueller team described as manaforts golden goose, ukrainian president victor yanukovych. Gates testified when he left it decreased the Income Stream. Heres how much the Income Stream was down. Gates testified that in 2016, manafort paid between 200,000 and 225,000 for yankees season tickets. But then, manafort asked gates to write a letter to the yankees saying that gates actually just borrowed manaforts credit card to make that huge purchase. This case that started with a lot of testimony and a lot of exhibits and ed showing that manafort lived a lavish lifestyle for several years has now evolved into a case about a former lobbyist and campaign
and whether there was collusion between the Trump Campaign an
unverifiable.all three of the we of which comey signed, top of the fisa application verified. gets worse commenced between himself was not the originating source for any of the so-called factual information in his reporting. steele instead relied on a primary sub source for information for use his or her network to gather information. there is only one source. pay close attention. this is huge. the fbi conducted interviews of that primary sub source, the one source that was used for the dossier by christopher steele pier that was in january. march and may of 2017, that raise significant questions about the reliability of the speech 29 election reporting. the primary and only sub stores told the fbi that he, she had not seen steele s reports until they became public that month and he/she made statements stating steele misstated or
and i think that actually he loves that. he thrives on that. but what he has tohr do here ise has to just have all of that ukrainian merck hanging off joe biden 24 hours aan day. tucker: you think you will get into the specifics of the impeachment efforts against him tonight? i think it will generally reference that it s a disgrace, which it is, and that there is no due process, which there isn t, and they are in fact trying to remove a president from office in the same stealthy underhand way in which comey and peter strzok and company ranl their original so-called counterintelligence operation four years ago, but i think is actually got to go beyond just saying it s a disgrace and explain why it is. and that it s not him who s being robbed, it s actually the millions of people who voted from him who are in effect having that election nullified one where the other by the democrats. tucker: we got an election a year from now, seems like that be enough.
president s statement would, quote, change the game by creating extraordinary pressure on the leadership on the department of justice, which comey did not trust, to appoint a special counsel who would preserve any potential tapes of his conversations with the president. it continues, by disclosing the contents of memo 4 through rickman, the columbia university professor that comey gave a special government employee status to, to the new york times comey made public sensitive investigative information relating to an ongoing f.b.i. investigation. and that was information he had properly declined to disclose while still f.b.i. director during congressional testimony. so what the inspector general found here is really two-fold. number one, he was not within his authority to leak this memo documenting a conversation with the president to the new york times. and that he took matters into his own hands