the president s confidence inner rick shinseki. he looked like he had had enough. dana, do you think he did a good job, or do you think, and i ask you this because you work for a boss who had a clear vision who gave what i could tell very specific goals and so it was easier for you to do your job even though i think you had a tougher press core. do you think it was tough for jay carney to do his job even though the press core was easier but because he was dealing with an administration that didn t give him a lot of good answers? if that is true and could be. we probably won t hear about that for awhile until jay carney decides whatever he is going to reveal at that time. from my personal experience. i worked for president bush who was guided by a very set principles, so he didn t waiver from them. so i could answer a question from the press by saying, yes, well, he would do this or that. sometimes i would take a risk and not talk to him before hand but i never screwed up in that way
had the honor and pleasure of meeting him and i would tell you that we are just continuing, we have lost lives as a result of this, neil. do you think that what comes through loudly is this notion that this president who didn t like this engagement in the middle east, just wanted out, and that that was something that just weighed on him, even gates himself said that the president never wavered in his support of the troops, it was just the mission, it wasn t in his dna to do so. iraq was not his war, i m getting out of this, end of story, we know that that is true, we saw it by his actions. and afghanistan was the place he thought he needed to make a stand, for whatever political reason, many, i might add. but hi didn t believe he could win, neil. right. and we didn t have the trust, he did not trust our commanders on the ground, it s almost as if he was very, very sick about who to trust and when to trust them,
of the evidence in this case, i came to that conclusion. would it be equally true though that george zimmerman was physically capable to overtake trayvon martin? would the flip side be true inin your opinion? when you say physically capable, you know, i have to take into consideration effing i know about the gentleman. weight wise is the only thing you can use as a comparison in m that regard. based on his background and training and effing about him, h i didn t think he would have thee physical prowess tos overtake trayvon martin. is what is it you knew about his physical abilities or lack there of?k what did you review specifically? the biggest source of information or the greatest source of information i hadi was from the gym owner that own assisted him in training andng a developed the programs for him m to lose the weight and try to get into some other physical type training programs to for weight loss and skill development. he was the greatest source where i learned tha
we present the evidence and the judge then says here is the evidence and here the law and it is your duty. it s not mine, it s not yours but the jury s duty to weigh and all of a sudden after them, they can t do their job? to be a social engineer. when the law doesn t get it right. we have right to object to the statement of the jury. doesn t mean that we believe overturned or it will or respect the decision that those six people made. there are millions of people that don t agree with the decision. greta: that is deeply disturbing. when you say millions you know and i know that millions of people who may not like the verdict whether for or against this case or another didn t a watch the case. didn t sit in the courtroom. didn t weigh the evidence. didn t listen to the jury instructions, that is just noise.
sanford police department that i was a retired judge when i talked to them. the question us is what are you doing talking to them. not only did he say hi didn t tell them he was a judge, is it not true that zimmerman s mother is a court check. i don t know if she was in sanford of seminal, but i understand that s their positions. so we have someone s child saying they know what forensics are, they know what police story is, yet the family of the victim, because there is no question that trayvon was the win killed that night. you don t know any of this evidence, is is that correct? we know none of it, and they continue to tell us they won t release any information or evidence because it s a pending