getting justice for a black victim from a nearly all white jury. how could it have been otherwise when the burden of proving martin s innocence was so high, his parents had to assert his humanity just to get an aarrest when this case became a political football divided along the left-right accism with some on the right posting zimmerman as the victim and predicting race riots would follow a not guilty verdict based on the idea that blacks are inherent lit violent. some whites would have rioted if he zimmerman had been found guilty. there s not a long history of painful injustice but who knows. the right part of why blacks vote predominant lit democratic just as gun tragedies like this interracial killing as well as the mass of enter racialings killings are why blacks support gun control measures at much
the tapes is admissible. whether it should even get into court. the two experts that the defense that the state brought on have really been slammed by the other experts. some world renowned experts saying they were using untested, unreliable and unscientific standards when they say the the states witnesses are saying they should be using them. do you think it will be allowed or not and does that give a huge advantage to one side or the other? it does give an advantage if it s left out. i hate to sound like a lawyer, but it s 50-50 on this one. the judge wants to be fair and let the jurors evaluate which side they want to give credibility to, but it s an appealable issue, and in the event of a conviction when they have witnesses using untested standards. mark, the zimmerman appeared in court today. i believe this is the first
which the prosecution is using the tapes is admissible. whether it should even get into court. the two experts that the defense that the state brought on have really been slammed by the other experts. some world renounled experts saying they were using untested, unreliable and unscientific standards when they say the the states witnesses are saying they should be using them. do you think it will be allowed or not and does that give a huge advantage to one side or the other? it does give an advantage if it s left out. i hate to sound like a lawyer, but it s 50-50 on this one. the judge wants to be fair and let the jurors evaluate which side they want to give credibility to, but it s an appealable issue, and in the event of a conviction when they have witnesses using untested standards. mark, the zimmerman appeared
sanford police department that i was a retired judge when i talked to them. the question us is what are you doing talking to them. not only did he say hi didn t tell them he was a judge, is it not true that zimmerman s mother is a court check. i don t know if she was in sanford of seminal, but i understand that s their positions. so we have someone s child saying they know what forensics are, they know what police story is, yet the family of the victim, because there is no question that trayvon was the win killed that night. you don t know any of this evidence, is is that correct? we know none of it, and they continue to tell us they won t release any information or evidence because it s a pending
acting from desperation if they re starting a website, getting on tv, ache making a case prior to going to the room. let me ask you, lou, you have zimmerman s attorney telling nbc that he shot trayvon at close range, watch this. in addition to the broken nose and the lacerations that you suggest, if the police followed protocol, and you re a former police officer, they would have blood splatter on his shirt not necessarily. depending on proximity. how close was he. they were closely engaged. it was a point-blank shot, but there is ef that the police have, and they don t do their investigation by sharing with you and i and having a crowd vote on it, they ll do an intire investigati