shooting suspect under the radar. but we begin with the number of fast moving developments in the russia probe. house intel committee member tom rouhani told fox news today that the russia investigation has become a dead end after testimony by white house aide hope hicks. well that s what president trump has been insisting with no evidence of collusion having been emerged. and now there are new charges from devin nunes that the fbi may have violated federal law in seeking that fisa warrant for carter page. and, there may be more indictments coming from the mueller team of more russians. this to my knowledge for the hacking. to get into it all, let s bring in former deputy independent council saul wisenburg, san francisco attorney and rnc committee woman from california harmeet dhillon and washington attorney and chair of the d.c. democratic party scott bold den. great to see all of you. we have a lot of news to get
judgen the fisa court if he knew what happened to this dossier and who paid for it that they would not at least gone back and said do you have anything else? this seems like a dlecket conflict of interest. go ahead, solve. they would have absolutely asked further questions. scott makes one fair point. fair point not a good point. let me compliment you, when they go back three times they have to have some kind of information about page. we don t know what that is. it doesn t change the fact, and this is what people aren t picking up on with exception of a couple of writers like andrew mccarthy. steele himself do have been the most credible person in the world. but almost all of his information was completely, i mean completely unverified. that s shocking and actually that s something the fisa judges should have to ape for some day or explain. i would like to hear about that. i don t care whether they
we know back in september of 016 that the intel agencies were picking up these communications and doing their own investigation. if you didn t verify everythinged in the fisa warrant, if you didn t document everything, that means there were other things in that fisa warrant that told you that the trump administration or the campaign needed to be investigated. and by the way, there is a term called croctio corroboratin that solve knows very well. if everything was corroborated, what are we talking about then. you make a big teal out of this fisa warrant. they won t back to the fisa judges three or four times i. what does it have to do with donald trump, why did four judges do it over and over again? lawyers lawyers because they weren t polled. hillary clinton paid for the dossier. even if they did. laura: solve, let s get down to brass tacks here or or harmeet. do you think that a federal
judgen the fisa court if he knew what happened to this dossier and who paid for it that they would not at least gone back and said do you have anything else? this seems like a dlecket conflict of interest. go ahead, solve. they would have absolutely asked further questions. scott makes one fair point. fair point not a good point. let me compliment you, when they go back three times they have to have some kind of information about page. we don t know what that is. it doesn t change the fact, and this is what people aren t picking up on with exception of a couple of writers like andrew mccarthy. steele himself do have been the most credible person in the world. but almost all of his information was completely, i mean completely unverified. that s shocking and actually that s something the fisa judges should have to ape for some day or explain. i would like to hear about that. i don t care whether they
are republicans or voted for harold sassens or what? i was going to agree that the misrepresentations for the fisa courts cannot be minimized here. they are critical and central to the issuance you have this warrant over single time and whetherth fisa is open to abuses like this. the other thing that is important is what different nunes. it not just lying to the fisa court. obstruction you have justice. conspiracy to violate the rights of american citizens. i don t agree with that. that s silly. none of it is proven. thanks, guys. there is a bullet. there is a bullet you had series of violations that he says are potential. i think the one that is protesty on yux is guidelines. phenomenal panel and i can t believe sol complimented