rosenstein s testimony that he has got to go to rod rosenstein if any of those things occur and he has got to get the imreement of rosenstein. so the real story here. i don t think there is any doubt he would have gotten authorization. the story is we know from the manafort indictment and the gates indictment all you have to do is look at it. then he got authorization long ago to go beyond the four cor conners at least the specific things is he supposed to looking at. i m surprised it hasn t been commented on that. earlier. if i can go back to mccabe, to me the two main things about mccabe that we have deep going back to, one, out gross conflict of interest. he should not have been involved in either the email or the clinton foundation investigation, which, if you believe news reports, he kept agencies from looking am looking at things. number two he is responsible for that fisa warrant. and that fisa warrant he has
are republicans or voted for harold sassens or what? i was going to agree that the misrepresentations for the fisa courts cannot be minimized here. they are critical and central to the issuance you have this warrant over single time and whetherth fisa is open to abuses like this. the other thing that is important is what different nunes. it not just lying to the fisa court. obstruction you have justice. conspiracy to violate the rights of american citizens. i don t agree with that. that s silly. none of it is proven. thanks, guys. there is a bullet. there is a bullet you had series of violations that he says are potential. i think the one that is protesty on yux is guidelines. phenomenal panel and i can t believe sol complimented
admitted and the shift memo did not contradict this. if they had not had the steel dossier. they woodland not have even submitted that. that s a shocking thing that fisa warrant. laura: in the devin nunes letter today, scott where he went chapters and verse about the doj guidelines, in part the accuracy of information contained within fisa applications is of utmost importance. only documented and verified information may be used to you support fbi applications, fisa, to the fisa court. they did not verify the outrageous allegations in this dossier and they couldn t. there was no way for them to, yet that was at the core of this application. was a federal statute violated in their submission of this fisa application. we will certainly never know that it seems to me et fundamental difference between democrats and republicans obviously is the republicans think it was the heart of that fisa warrant and the democrats think it was part of it.
admitted and the shift memo did not contradict this. if they had not had the steel dossier. they woodland not have even submitted that. that s a shocking thing that fisa warrant. laura: in the devin nunes letter today, scott where he went chapters and verse about the doj guidelines, in part the accuracy of information contained within fisa applications is of utmost importance. only documented and verified information may be used to you support fbi applications, fisa, to the fisa court. they did not verify the outrageous allegations in this dossier and they couldn t. there was no way for them to, yet that was at the core of this application. was a federal statute violated in their submission of this fisa application. we will certainly never know that it seems to me et fundamental difference between democrats and republicans obviously is the republicans think it was the heart of that fisa warrant and the democrats think it was part of it.
we know back in september of 016 that the intel agencies were picking up these communications and doing their own investigation. if you didn t verify everythinged in the fisa warrant, if you didn t document everything, that means there were other things in that fisa warrant that told you that the trump administration or the campaign needed to be investigated. and by the way, there is a term called croctio corroboratin that solve knows very well. if everything was corroborated, what are we talking about then. you make a big teal out of this fisa warrant. they won t back to the fisa judges three or four times i. what does it have to do with donald trump, why did four judges do it over and over again? lawyers lawyers because they weren t polled. hillary clinton paid for the dossier. even if they did. laura: solve, let s get down to brass tacks here or or harmeet. do you think that a federal