write book two but the problem is that a lot this file release has been terrible by the national archives. they ve had 25 years to prepare for this. the answer by the way on the cia is page two is missing but the answer from helms is no, and he s on the record on other cases in saying it more than that, i talked to bellen the attorney for the warren chigs before he died many times, he was always amazed at how strong the cia was in denying any association with oswald. cia agent, no, asset, whether the cia knew he might be dangerous from mexico city but that s what these documents do make good news people and yourself and brianna question those things because they don t provide it in any context. the archives dumb it out and then they remove the redactions from some of the earlier files released 10 or 15 years ago without telling you what s new, so there s a whole recycling i see in the european press of old news stories today told 15 or 20 years ago but sound so good i don t envy anyo
knew what was happening. the question is, didn t the cia have an inkling of that and why didn t the cia share that with washington? there s the issue of how much or if the cia was actually working in some capacity with lee harvey oswald, and maybe they created more questions than they answered last night. let me read an excerpt of mr. helms. he said is there information involved in the assassination of president kennedy that shows oswald was in some way an agent, dot, dot, dot, and the files released overnight bears no answer. we are left with the question wondering what the former cia director said. that s the biggest problem. if you don t read the entirety of the files i mean, it took me over nine years to read
zeroing in on the votes necessary. look at the headline in the new york times. ainsley: you know the media has a lot of power. they are trying to make you believe this is awful for you. this is the headline in the new york times. latest obamacare repeal effort is most far-reaching. the washington post says even republicans know their new healthcare bill is horrible. steve: politico says last-2keu67 obamacare repeal bill has worst elms of earlier plans. brian: main thing with this. is it true that this new plan actually covers preexisting conditions in the president says i won t sign anything that doesn t have it. we watched jimmy kimmel tonight it s not going to be there. it s going to give governors the opportunity to take that away. senator graham heard credits coons say give governors chance to take it away. he came on special report last night and followed up with this statement. nope can be denied coverage because of preexisting illness. nobody can be kicked out of
business about the rosenstein memo was a pretext. he s admitted to the russian ambassador that, in fact, he got the russian investigation off his back by firing comey. i mean there is just a massive amount of corrupt intent here that would support an obstruction case. so obviously he s under investigation. obviously the special counsel is going to be talking to the two national security people, coats and helms, as to or rogers, rather. that s a big deal. that corroborates exactly what the director comey said in terms of what the president was asking him to do. so, eugene, what s your viewers and readers guide to what we re witnessing? you know, i think when the attorney, mr. sekulow, went out yesterday and again today, i don t think he had information. i think he had instructions. i think he probably had instructions from the president of the united states to go
income and wealth and equality, they re going to take on the greed of the pharmaceutical industry. those people want to make colleges tuition tree, who understand unlike president trump that climate change is real and we ve got to transform our energy system spot we re going to work to support progressives who are running for the senate, who are running for the house, who are running, and tom perez made this point, for school board, city council sill, state legislature. ooimt i m right now in kansas. last night we had 5,000 people coming out in the ta peeka, kansas. kansas is not a democratic strong hold but we re beginning to see in kansas and in states and dmunts all over this country people were prepared to take on trump, people are prepared to fight for progressive change. that sounded like you are saying that you re going to keep your elms to support the candidates that you think are progressives and you re not going to give it to account international democratic