write book two but the problem is that a lot this file release has been terrible by the national archives. they ve had 25 years to prepare for this. the answer by the way on the cia is page two is missing but the answer from helms is no, and he s on the record on other cases in saying it more than that, i talked to bellen the attorney for the warren chigs before he died many times, he was always amazed at how strong the cia was in denying any association with oswald. cia agent, no, asset, whether the cia knew he might be dangerous from mexico city but that s what these documents do make good news people and yourself and brianna question those things because they don t provide it in any context. the archives dumb it out and then they remove the redactions from some of the earlier files released 10 or 15 years ago without telling you what s new, so there s a whole recycling i see in the european press of old news stories today told 15 or 20 years ago but sound so good i don t envy anyo