Elections are complex. Running them is hard. And Pennsylvania is still building its system. That was clear in last week’s primary, when more than 2.2 million voters participated in the first non-presidential election since the state dramatically expanded mail voting. It was a test of a still-new system, and there were points of clear failure or acute stress pointing to both new and .
Close
As Republican lawmakers across the country have moved to tighten voting laws after former President Donald Trumpâs lies about a stolen election, Pennsylvaniaâs GOP-controlled legislature has waited to act during months of hearings.
Now Republicans in Harrisburg are making their first moves, with the state House GOP releasing a report Monday that outlines a sweeping set of changes they hope to negotiate in time for next yearâs elections, when open races for governor and U.S. Senate will be on the ballot.
The 99-page report from Rep. Seth Grove (R., York), chair of the House State Government Committee, summarizes testimony from elections administrators, advocates, and policy experts the committee gathered during 10 hearings.
Can There be a Re-do of the Election? – Investment Watch investmentwatchblog.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from investmentwatchblog.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
December 11, 2020 | Can There be a Re-do of the Election?
Martin Armstrong Martin Arthur Armstrong is the former chairman of Princeton Economics International Ltd. He is best known for his economic predictions based on the Economic Confidence Model, which he developed.
There is an interesting question that seems never to have been answered. Back in 2016, the Democrats alleged based upon mere allegations that
Hillary made for political reasons, that there was Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election so she really won. Everyone has tried to reject that because it really taints both sides of the aisle. There was never any hard evidence of that whichever came to light despite the countless amount of money spent on the Mueller investigation. In a court of law, Hillary should have reimbursed the government for all of those costs.