i know you took almost two years to come to these conclusions but i don t believe it and therefore i m running my parallel investigation with john durham. as president trump said last week, maybe anticipating the report wasn t going the way he hoped for, he said the big one to wait for is the durham report. but it s the narrative that they re trying to advance here is indelibly muddied by this ig report. you can t undo that. republicans who were inspect i suppose a political response here, political reaction, should know that they have failed the expectations game in a very similar way to how proponents of a theory of russian collusion failed the expectations gain of the mueller report. what mueller report alleged is serious and actionable by congress, attempted obstruction of justice. but it failed to meet the threshold of a conspiracy to work with a foreign outcome to affect a political outcome domestically. fisa warrant is a live issue. they said for a long time the
republican, probably all republicans voting against them and then we ll move on to the senate. but that s where it s going to be much more complicated picture. but i will say a less complicated picture. that senate trial has implications here because of the two articles two. more articles would have made for a much more complicated senate trial that could have lasted for more like two months. now it s a trial that will last probably two or three weeks. so, clair, we ll see less than two hours from now american his frid history. you ll see them congress. do you think they re going the right way here in terms of keeping it narrowly focussed to ukraine or is it worth opening up the mueller report and digging deeper into all of this? as a prosecutor you want to bring your strongest case. there are many, many times a prosecutor makes a decision, i could charge all of these crimes, but i don t want the jury to be distracted from the simplest case with the most evidence. and i reall