militarily, nato is the most potent military alliance in the world, but were still not quite sure how to utilise that, how to stand up to putin s aggression. to stand up to putin s aggression. to stand up to putin s an uression. ., ., aggression. you ve got some ideas. a no-fly aggression. you ve got some ideas. a no-fly zone, - aggression. you ve got some ideas. a no-fly zone, for - ideas. a no fly zone, for instance. you know that there are regular objections to this. nato chiefjens stoltenberg nato chief jens stoltenberg says nato chiefjens stoltenberg says the only way to prevent a no fly zone is designed nato fleet of planes fighter planes into ukraine as pace and impose that no fly zone by shooting down russian planes was top us secretary of state anthony blinken says that could lead to a fully fledged war in europe. they don t want it. let s just take that in part. firstly, as i suggest, we have moved into a new era of insecurity. we have had in the past 30 years, this p
well, let sjust take that in part. firstly, as i suggest, we ve moved into a new era of insecurity. what we ve had over the last 30 years is this peacetime mode that we ve moved into. we ve been pretty fortunate. we re now resorting back to type. the world is an angry place. you get state on state aggression, and we re back to seeing that today. but the west hasn t advanced, hasn t woken up to the scale of aggression of what we should actually do about it. but on the issue of no fly zones. the no fly zone is one operational response that you could have in relation to russia, to stand up to russia and to help ukraine. but you have to ask yourself, what is the wider strategy? but can i just stay on that one? could have should they be imposing a no fly zone? let me finish, because from a military perspective, any operational commitment such as a no fly zone must fit into a bigger strategic picture. what is our strategy to stand up to putin? are we trying to support ukraine by denying
that we ve moved into. we ve been pretty fortunate. we re now resorting back to type. the world is an angry place. you get state on state aggression, and we re back to seeing that today. but the west hasn t advanced, hasn t woken up to the scale of aggression of what we should actually do about it. but on the issue of no fly zones. the no fly zone is one operational response that you could have in relation to russia, to stand up to russia and to help ukraine. but you have to ask yourself, what is the wider strategy? but can i just stay on that one? could have should they be imposing a no fly zone? let me finish, because from a military perspective, any operational commitment such as a no fly zone must fit into a bigger strategic picture. what is our strategy to stand up to putin? are we trying to support ukraine by denying the airspace? are we trying to stand up to russia by denying them access to ukraine? or do we think it will bleed outside? these are important questions to be an
sanctions side, but militarily, nato is the most potent military alliance in the world, but we re still not quite sure how to utilise that, how to stand up to putin s aggression. you ve got some ideas a no fly zone, for instance. you know that there are regular objections to this. nato chiefjens stoltenberg says the only way to implement a no fly zone is to send nato fighter planes into ukrainian airspace and then impose that no fly zone by shooting down russian planes. us secretary of state antony blinken says, and that could lead to a fully fledged war in europe. they don t want it. well, let sjust take that in part. firstly, as i suggest, we ve moved into a new era of insecurity. what we ve had over the last 30 years is this peacetime mode that we ve moved into. we ve been pretty fortunate. we re now resorting back to type. the world is an angry place. you get state on state aggression, and we re back to seeing that today. but the west hasn t advanced, hasn t woken up to the sca