was done. if you go back to march 10th, 2015, hillary clinton said none of my e-mails weren t marked classified. what we found, doesn t mean national security professionals agree with her. he talked about logistics. what could be more security sensitive than the location of the first daughter? we still don t know what wasn t turned over. they haven t articulated the standard her lawyers used. if she s e-mailing folks about her personal opinions on foreign leaders, that s probably a government record. and her opinions as a government official is probably classified. you made an important point. this is a government attorney. this isn t someone who represents the american people. it s ivanka s own private
we re going to have to talk about it until the press gets something more than donald trump to talk b iabout. i ve had the position that there s no there , there. there was no classified information sent or received by her, because at the time they weren t marked classified, or the state department, as it often does, as standard operating procedure, to classify stuff after the fact, which is what s going on right now. so i don t think, in the long run, i don t think it s going to hurt hillary, but it s hurt her some because the republican talking points are pretty good. and the press core s not as up to speed as it ought to be. the new york times is acknowledged to be one of the best papers in the country has printed two stories that were completely wrong, one about the e-mails and one about the financial donations. that s pretty bad. these guys need to get a life. and when the campaign gets more life than donald trump s nonsense, perhaps these issues will be more seriously, taken
weren t marked classified, or the state department, as it often does, as standard operating procedure, to classify stuff after the fact, which is what s going on right now. so i don t think, in the long run, i don t think it s going to hurt hillary, but it s hurt her some because the republican talking points are pretty good. and the press core s not as up to speed as it ought to be. the new york times is know best papers in the country has printed two stories that were lerong, one about the e-mails and one abth financial donations. that s pretty bad. these guys ntoet life. and when the campaign gets more life than donald trump s nonsense, perhaps these issues will be more seriously, taken more seriously. the inspectors general of the state department and the intelligence communities were concerned enough that there was a breach of national security to recommend that the fbi open a criminal investigation into it. they are obviously concerned the way that this e-mail was handled.
answer. hillary clinton has offered many information for having her own e-mail server none of which sand up. steven hayes and dick cheney agree. no defense to say they weren t marked classified. they are saying now this stuff is so sensitive we can t make it public now. surely it was more sensitive when she was serving as secretary of state and the information was more contemporaneous. that s a huge problem for her. there s no good explanation for it. that s why we are not hearing an explanation from her. i know from my own experience when you go in those kind of jobs you are briefed on how to handle classified information. it looks to me like she approached it in the amateurish not professional way. donald trump attacking jeb bush on illegal immigration in a