place. the study goes on to remind us, and it really is stunning just not have it laid out all at once. without all of the noise, just have the facts laid out. the russian hacking of the democratic committee, the stolen emails that could strategically leaked to hurt hillary s campaign, and help donald trump. testing the waters by campaign advisor. approaching trump son who is open to their pitch. the trump tower meeting, wikileaks disseminating the stolen emails, trump reading the cam pain stop after campaign stop. the russians attempting to hack hillary clinton s private server. hours after trump urged them to on live tv. the huge social media campaign being carried out from russia to benefit trump. trump s campaign chair of meeting regularly with the russian campaign officer, who he provided with key internal polling data from the trump campaign. trump s national security adviser having secret conversations with the russian government and lying to the fbi about
regardless of whether he makes it out of the primary or not, will highlight the failures and corruption that seem to overflow from this president and his party. i think that presents a challenge. i did think that was interesting he would bring that up in the campaign as the announcers, deneen, not sure if he will talk about record unemployment, skyrocketing wages, seven million job openings as failure, i am not sure, the market at all-time high. which failure will bloomberg key in on? i would like you to tell me, as well. michael bloomberg, this man has a huge campaign to kill the coal industry and problem with fracking and natural gas, as well. we re talking great-paying jobs, not minimum wage jobs, the u.s. is number one producer of oil and natural gas. that mind set hurt hillary, particularly in comments she made in west virginia. bring james back to this.
indictment that they were looking to use the wikileaks drops strategically, right, that they were trying to either detract from bad news or hurt hillary s campaign. whatever they were doing they were trying to do something active and strategic with that. this gives us more color on what they were trying to avoid during those late stages of the campaign. the problem is what is that legally, and i don t think it rises to the level of conspiracy. you know, they re not dealing with the rugs. russians. they re dealing with wikileaks, and what they re trying to get i think is not going to rise the level of a campaign contribution as to violate the campaign finance laws. jerome corsi said that stone allegedly told him to release these stolen e-mails, to get them released because of the vulgar tape. there should be lost of text and e-mail evidence that would show that, right? probably. or at least you d turn the screws on corsi and one of the
that this decision by strzok was free from bias. richard. here s what is not plausible to me. the intelligence community says that the russians meddled to hurt hillary. the intelligence committee said the same thing. the president meanwhile is basically saying i ll ask putin if he did it and if he didn t why are now not strzok. strzok could this is what the democrats did. strzok could have blown the campaign to high heaven by disclosing what he knew. laura: let me tell you why that is a lame point. you know why? because it s would be have been so overtly obvious and stupid for him to do that, easily trace back to him. but he was such a fanatic and he biassed this thing so badly
responsibility? yes, sir. laura: lpr is another wing of the justice department. he is under investigation. we knit picking here? republicans sometimes can get in a position where they are perceived to be knit picking on issues that are not the primary issues. but also by the inspector general for the trump/russia collusion. and the ig report is just about hillary. they are looking at his role in that. he is a subject in that. laura: jason, before we let you go, what are the grounds for an fbi general counsel to shut down questioning and answering questions from congressional oversight committee hearings like this? he kept relying on that. is that valid? it is absolutely not valid. and i can tell you the former chairman of the oversight committee there is no attorney/client privilege