asw, as a result, judge doty issued unhinge ad sanctioneral against all federal government employees from having contac tntact with social media companies and discouraging or removingwi free speech. that means the cdc, the fbi, the doeansj, the white house. the judge specifically. namechecked. white house spokeswoman. karine jean-pierre. hhs secretary xavier becerracrer and surgeon general vivek murthy. noy n generalw on your screen if prohibited activities for the feds, which include meeting, emailing, flagging, callin meetingg, collaborating, threatening, urging, following up or issuing bolo g,s. be on the lookout for censoredt content with social media. it is an absolutelye ce stunning rebuke of the censorship deep state and the biden administrationnsp and it s a win for free speech. r, the bidenou administration has appealed this judge s injunction. k now, judges don t usually talk like this. they don t issue such scathinghi opinions or broad injunctions. why here? well,
is next. personally, when you think about some of the things that have taken place in corporatings het that america, but it wasn t that itit was an effort to sort of make ws an effor at to even to play. it scales to some degree because of the inequities. becay. n-amer that gets the african-american community in this country. it wasn t about giving theicn cm advantage. it was about highlighting the fact that they were discriminate thatg thd, meaning we were discriminated against at that particular moment in time. and that s why the policy was instituted to begin with. so when folks are walkinghere around acting as if there is a i reason to celebrate, and i m lookins a to celebg folks that l that are feeling like somehow, some way they ve been short changed, my mentality is, wait a minute. the policies wer minute.e impled to begin with because the african-american community was being shortchanged and theyy we were being denied the same privileges oniedr the same. opportunities that were