analysis. we began with mary and rafferty live, with the latest in a frightening string of attacks in san francisco marion good evening. good evening violent we can across the nation not to shoot his terrifying residence it was known as san francisco stroller alley, mothers and nannies say they have become a target of my violent muggings at the hands of the gangs and kids wearing masks and will willing baseball backs. this doorbell camera video you see, obtained by the san francisco chronicle , shows one of the incidents where the woman was attacked by a male wearing a ski mask. other two women were reportedly assaulted last week, by youth who allegedly struck a woman with a bat, and a number that was it in the face. san francisco police believe the group that is responsible for 11 thefts in the final week of june alone. the know we valley areas won of san francisco s wealthiest communities. known for young families average home, is valued at $1.7 million. robberies in the
asw, as a result, judge doty issued unhinge ad sanctioneral against all federal government employees from having contac tntact with social media companies and discouraging or removingwi free speech. that means the cdc, the fbi, the doeansj, the white house. the judge specifically. namechecked. white house spokeswoman. karine jean-pierre. hhs secretary xavier becerracrer and surgeon general vivek murthy. noy n generalw on your screen if prohibited activities for the feds, which include meeting, emailing, flagging, callin meetingg, collaborating, threatening, urging, following up or issuing bolo g,s. be on the lookout for censoredt content with social media. it is an absolutelye ce stunning rebuke of the censorship deep state and the biden administrationnsp and it s a win for free speech. r, the bidenou administration has appealed this judge s injunction. k now, judges don t usually talk like this. they don t issue such scathinghi opinions or broad injunctions. why here? well,
you see, republicans had a change of heart on 702 and became champions for free speech because they became the target for illegale surveillance and censorship. the press and democrats, who once championed themselves as protectorats of free speech, also had a change of heart on surveillance and censorshipcc because they liked that republicans became the target of surveillance and censorship. in the end, this entire story, o it s not about free speech. it s not about speech at all. a it s only about and has alwaysbo been only abouen onlt control in power. that is, i guess, unless a judge in louisiana can really stop big brother journalist michael shellenberger joins us now. mike, it s always great to seey you. you ve seen the judge s opinion. you are deep inthaeee so this. a you have reported extensively on the government surveillance programsved extens. a what do you think? was this a great victory for free speecfr speech? w absolutely. it was a great f 4th of july
asw, as a result, judge doty issued unhinge ad sanctioneral against all federal government employees from having contac tntact with social media companies and discouraging or removingwi free speech. that means the cdc, the fbi, the doeansj, the white house. the judge specifically. namechecked. white house spokeswoman. karine jean-pierre. hhs secretary xavier becerracrer and surgeon general vivek murthy. noy n generalw on your screen if prohibited activities for the feds, which include meeting, emailing, flagging, callin meetingg, collaborating, threatening, urging, following up or issuing bolo g,s. be on the lookout for censoredt content with social media. it is an absolutelye ce stunning rebuke of the censorship deep state and the biden administrationnsp and it s a win for free speech. r, the bidenou administration has appealed this judge s injunction. k
dangerous on social media. how, isaacson he surely has enough honorary degrees to know that the government is notnoknow a private citizen and that their suggestions, their speech caezen ann carry the force of ce law. but what is he talking about when he talks about something being dangerous? beins? dangerouthing that must be censored? well, that was also answered today on msnbc as the judge makes exceptions for the j natic security and criminal activity. but isn t there a fine linurinae when it comes to national security, specifically, segecially when we re talkin about elections here, the fact that election, you know, the fullt th faith of the amerin public has in elections could i be undermined. couldn t that potentially be a national security threat? see. ursnational oh, so like terrorism, specific, violent threats, vaccine, misinformation, covid origins, mask compliance. rfk jr. donald trump denying the results of or tweeting about and potentially influencing an election outside.