they worth delaying this whole process? my understanding is that your fixated on work rules and whether they began in fiscal year, 2024, i don t to lose anybody in the weeds versus fiscal, your 2025. it seems like you re tinkering at the margins. welfare to work should be a cornerstone of the negotiation, if bill clinton a new gingrich can work, deals than certainly we should be able to make those with joe biden. and if any feature of this deal is sincere, it will start immediately. the oldest trick in washington is to delay things two, three, five years down the road to tell the voters that you believe in them but to get the spending now and the cuts delayed. i m not falling for that trick. my colleagues who put conditions on speaker mccarthy are not going to fall for that trick. , and let me answer the question you asked in the monologue. absolutely, features of the deal that allowed kevin mccarthy to ascend to the speakership require him to fight on the top line spending
whether they begin in fiscal year 2024. i don t want to lose everybody in the weeds, versus fiscal year 2025. it seems like you re tinkering at the margins. welfare to work should be a corner stone of these negotiations. bill clinton and newt gring rich can make welfare to work deals. we should make those with joe biden. any feature of this deal is sincere, it will start immediately. the oldest trick in washington is to delay things two, three, five years down the road to tell the voters that you believe in them but to get the spending now and the cuts delayed. i m not falling for that trick. my colleagues who put conditions on speaker mccarthy are not going to fall for that trick. and let me answer the question you asked in your monologue, absolutely. features of the deal that allowed kevin mccarthy to ascend to the speakership require him to fight on top line spending levels in this debt limit battle and to not delay that for the appropriations process that