we re not even talking about the lead up to this conflict by that point, why were you there originally to do a duck documentary, what was it about ukraine or maybe it was about zelenskyy that interested you? get i think i was in the better part of the population with enter understanding of ukraine, with the exception of a phone call between president and zelenskyy and president trump that was made a lot of and the fact that president zelenskyy had been a comedic actor who ha betrayed an actor who became th he went initially to make a documentary that had kind of a bring home a sense of ukraine and a profile of this president fred. it wouldn t bent as interesting and then the next thing you do is this build up o vladimir putin on the eastern side of ukraine. first we have 50,000 troops, then it s 100,000 troops and then all the military equipment and you are chronicling all of this and you develop a relationship with zelenskyy perry telus, as this was unfolding, a lot of t
they would give those weapons t russia to be destroyed in exchange for protection from russia, great britain, and the u.s. the lesson to be learned here, don t give up your nuclear weapons because you can t peopl like vladimir putin. even can become intimidated and we re seeing that with country. i fear what that legacy is goin to be. i think the west made a mistake in this buildup that putin as he brought in 10,000 troops and 20,000, we will get up to 100,000 and it became ver transparent and obvious that he was going to come in and of the military equipment with it at that point i thought nato countries and western european countries and the u.s. should have anticipated what was prett obvious as an for that moment