sod a lot oque franf really ine and quite frankly, startling d details. et d the devilon is inal the deo and i ll trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mart r a lago. e there could be numerous there could be numerous just donald trumadp as well as additional crimes that coulds be charged. hee getting th is she kidding me? now, she mightat be getting tht idea from one of the smalls parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted likerr on page thirty . we re referring to presidentum trump and p and those around hi quote, criminal parties, but stilstl didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that t releasinthgs team the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee t or destroy evidence stord electronically and otherwise fleed . on really, trump s plane has hisan name on itde and destroyhing electronic evidence. do they mean doing something like, i don t know, deleting lit thirty three thousa
is a legal sanction. i don t think it s proper whatsoever. so the fbi accused you of disseminating russian moreeminating russian the laptop and won more investigations intoestigat do they deserve the benefit of the doubt here? well, i think top democrats created intelligence product out of whole cloth, hadproduc a classified excuse. thatassified excuse. senator grassley and i have a 16 to 70 russianatorss disinformation. whatley the fbi did, according. whistleblowers. now, they had a scheme in august augus 2020 to downplay derog the derogatory information of hunter and basically deep sixed the investigation. that was the sam was thee monte they offered us an unsolicited briefing saying that we are target of russianformatio disinformation to this day. we don t knoonw who directed t that, although we vewh in severa public letters and now we havel a whistleblower cominge fbi to and whistleblowers coming in saying that the fbi told themk t point blank, you will not look