yeah. when you look at new hampshire, typically the top thing people look for is strong leadership and you know, you saw yesterday they were looking for somebody who can beat obama and i think what that says is, you know, that romney did work hard. he got a solid win in new hampshire. not to take away from that but the reality is he won by default more or less. the people looked at other candidates, gosh, we might like where they are better than we like where romney is but we don t feel like they would match up as well against the president. so it has to be romney. jon: a lot of talk has been made and a lot of ink has been printed about dissatisfaction with the republican field but you know, our post exit polling didn t find that to be the case. we asked if you re satisfied with the candidates, this is new hampshire only poll, and 66% of those in new hampshire said yeah, we like this republican slate. now 31% said they didn t.
spent time on this morning has a whole section, jon, dedicated to the most controversial pageant moms. back to you. jon: mom was right there. reporter: right there. jon: yeah. i guess if mom wasn t there that might abetter thing. i don t know. jenna: thought we would have a conversation like, is that appropriate? i wonder if it is appropriate? no, it is not appropriate. reporter: not appropriate. conversation over. jenna: and we re done. jon: what some people will do to be on tv i like this reality television a whole lot better. jenna: live news. our own reality tv. should have a camera in the newsroom. what do you think about that? catch conversations at media desk, foreign desk. interesting stuff. not quite as interesting as toddlers. we have new reaction as the u.s. supreme court takes up issue of profanity on the airwaves. hit tv shows gets ready to test the boundaries of public taste. wow, i have a daughter who bites and a partner who stinks. you want to know the
horoscope who how things happen. you won t get me to bite on the horror scope. what you re looking at is a fuzzy crystal ball. jenna: okay. while we have the machine that can look at our genes we don t have the dictionary to translate everything. you will get problem listic things and risky things but not 100% certain because the gene is there you will get this down the road. just increases the risk. jenna: that fuzzy crystal ball analogy works. that is good one of the let s go with that. as a doctor what concerns do you have about having this technology out there for just the average consumer to sign up for? we don t have an hour to go through this but there are some big issues here. a lot of benefits, but, if you start predicting who is going to get diseases, are they going to be able to buy life insurance? will they be forced to pay a lot more for their health insurance? will they have to pay more for disability insurance? obviously if i m at
jenna: that issue of the drugs, pharmaceuticals is one i would also like to ask you about. designer drugs, is that really where we re headed with some of this information? it would be a huge market for pharmaceutical companies but you get into costs. you get into whether or not these drugs can be designed to specifically fit your dna and whether or not they re really better than ones we take right now. is that where we re heading with some of this? that s a great question and the answer is yes. i think the risk information is nice. although when you think about it, we give people a lot of risk information today and they don t do anything about it. but i might say you re overweight or need to stop smoking. that is putting you at a lot of risk. people say, no, i can t really deal with that. i m not sure they re going to change their behavior just because they have genetic risks. but designing drugs that fit your biology, diminish chance of side-effect and may increase the odds that the
which i wear with a badge of honor! newt gingrich and rick perry need to consider that, too. they ve both been in politics for a very long time, they have enjoyed the largees of the enormous taxes that companies, private equity firms and other companies, have been paying. maybe they should be a little more thoughtful of taxpayers than to just trash them for making good money. jon: south carolina, you re going to be seeing a blizzard of ads coming up. pay attention! charlie hurt from the washington times, thanks charlie. jenna: this fox news alert, brand new reaction breaking moments ago from our state department on a top iranian nuclear scientist assassinated. reports say he had been working at a key nuclear facility there when he was targeted in a car bombing. you re seeing images on your screen now that we got from inside iran. his death is similar to previous killings of scientists working on iran s nuclear program. always a mystery. always raises a lot of questions. reena ninan i