gun groups are upset and voting rights groups. if vigilants try to stop people from voting is problematic. we see that roberts. konecny-barrett is somebody who has very much been on the pro life side and i think she is seen as an anti-abortion justice and likely to side with alito on the court and swing voter is kavanaugh. for those that want to see the law struck down they have to rely on him to swing with roberts and roberts stays where he is. kavanaugh voted with roberts. there s an indication for him to be chief justice himself. donna, my question is similar
to be sued. so the judge is the right defendant here. interesting. and if that suit doesn t work there s a separate suit where the united states is suing texas directly and complications if the united states is allowed to do that but the u.s. is allowed to sue a state directly in a way that private parties are not. interesting. let s zero in on the three justices for a moment. what challenges are they facing? could one be a swing vote in this particular case do you think? we saw roberts already once join with the liberal justices with regard to texas on the losing side so roberts raised questions about basically what s at irs issue here.
with private bounty hunters, so that there be no texas state official that can be sued. but judges still have to issue orders, enforcing the law, if someone wins a lawsuit. so the judge seems to be the right defendant here, if that suit doesn t work, there s also a separate suit, with the united states is suing texas directly. there s some complications as to whether or not the united states is allowed to do that. but one thing that makes the u.s. different, is that the u.s. is allowed to sue a state directly, in a way that private parties are. not interesting. john, let zero in on three specific justices for. mitt roberts, kavanaugh, finn bera. what challenges are each one, facing and could one of them be a swing vote in this particular case? we saw roberts already toying with the liberal justices, with regards to texas on the losing side. roberts has raised questions
well. when this plan has actually no impact on our environment on the long run. rob: both serious issues. i understand that. let s back back to the top if i can. we saw roberts over on msnbc asking if somebody thought the president might be trying to inspire an attack that he wanted to provoke an attack happening which, you know, a lot of people is an unfair question. evangeline i want to ask you, would you say there is also an argument that the left maybe wants to deny that these attacks are happening, that they don t really like covering these stories because it doesn t fit a liberal narrative? look, there are lots of issues how america is going to cover this and have a have a right opinions. that s what you are seeing many toims. people are being controversial because viewers want somebody that is going to push the envelope that attracts penal. the issues i have seen with all the networks i have looked at people have been trying to cover these thai attacks in a responsible way, to