and as you previewed in the t angle or samhe alito might nothi have had the opportunity to write this dobbs opinion were it not for the fact that a certain commentator named laura ingraham tooknd l on supre court nominee harriet miers challenged her record and president bush back in 2005 remember this the burden really is on him to show us whya harriet miers is a judicial conservative given what she said in nineteen ninety three about abortion, given what she said about the role of the courts, how could she square those comments with what she said in nineteen eighty nine and that questionnaire where she said i m for a pro-life amendmentst w, the texas constitution and as you know a president bush rescinded her nomination and nominated sam alito, which wouldn t haveor happened had it not been for your activism but judicial falak can t believe matter h and that was your gripeer with her. yeah well it was a tabula rasaht . we io didn t know what she thout and we didn t know what judge
0 to people and they say they took away our right to abortion. you can tell them the truth. that s not what today s decision did. they decided who gets to decide and the constitution is clear . it s the states all the time we have left this evening. thanks for being with us. thank you for making the show possible. stay with the fox news channel for continuing coverage, not your heartbeat troubled laura s next . we ll see on monday. i m laura ingram and this is ingraham angle on a triumphant friday night from new york answered prayers. that s the focus of tonight s angle on january 22nd . nineteen seventy three almost fifty years ago, seven members of the supreme held that under the fourteenth amendment of our constitution the same constitute that americans and fought and died to protect elected officials could not protect the unborn from abortion. now ever since that time,l abortion has been a constitutional right now this is a painful and humiliating experience forov tens of million