unless it is the media pointing their cameras at one pregnant man. sometimes i wonder how many so-called pregnant men there are on the planet. are there enough on the globe to fill up one isn t it funny how no one ever counts i think? is it too hard to, or is it they would not like the answer because i knew you wouldn t be able to justify the emoji? but that is okay with the media. you know it is not okay? the okay sign, seen here. [alarms] like my alarm clock. the nebraska cornhuskers, whatever that is, decided to change their hideously racist mascot logo. originally herbie husker is making an okay gesture. as reported in the media, some, the mysterious sum, we don t know who, have linked this symbol to white supremacy.
we now are sitting back watching four people who actually, many of us did not vote in, and we feel like we have been taken hostage to their politics. reporter: and things sort of escalated from there. someone, and we don t know who, filed the colorado open act, they were going to publish those names. governor tweeted the doxing of the elected officials with teachers is always wrong and dangerous. the other issue is that under colorado s open leading law, school board members do not have authority to act on their own without informing the entire board. a lawsuit by a parent who wants the judge to nullify the firing of the superintendent to bar the local school from conducting these closed door meetings and then yesterday, there were these bizarre flyers left on teachers cartes telling them they were b
fox news anchors knew. up and down the line, people knew how serious, what was going on at the capitol was, and yet, there are those who still have refused to publicly come out and say it, and who are double dealing publicly, quite frankly. absolutely. charlie, it s so remarkable to read these texts in realtime. as gloria says, they knew the danger was unfolding, how deadly it could be. they knew what real leadership should look like. they knew trump wasn t stepping up to call off the mob. lives were depending on it. that s what you see in the urgency of the texts. when you see the lawmakers, i wish we knew the names of the lawmakers. for whatever reason they haven t released them, and i want to ask you about that, but we don t know who. yesterday was a terrible day, we tried everything we could in our objections to the six states. i m sorry, nothing worked. apologizing that they weren t able to overturn a free and fair
and the r congressman, the republican congressman, we don t know who. then it is one day later when jeffrey clark was head of the civil division, a division that won t have any part in investigating election issues but he took it on and drafted a letter to be sent to governors in georgia where he falsely wrote that doj had found voting issues that impacted the outcome in several states something that was wrong and he wanted donahue and rosen to sign off but they won t. and in fact, donahue swiftly put his foot down and wrote back this, there is no chance that i would sign this letter or anything remotely like this, from what i stand this is not even within the realm of possibility. but beyond this, there is likely more that we will learn since trump was obviously so focused on getting doj to interject itself into the electorate process to overturn the election. the good news, jim, is that doj has cleared the way for top
believes there was a crime committed to underline what joe said, we don t know who, if it was donald trump or someone else in his orbit, but what would it take to seat a grand jury in this case? well, a grand jury has both a charging function and an investigative function. so as long as cy vance believes he has credible allegations that a crime may have been committed, that would be a sufficient basis to convene those grand jury. but i think it s a significant step because we ve long known that cy vance has documents. so he is now likely completed his review of those documents. if there were nothing there, nothing to suggest to him that a crime has been committed, there would be no need to convene this grand jury. the fact that he has says to me that he has found sufficient evidence in those documents to believe he should take that next step. and in new york, it s necessary to present all of the evidence before a grand jury. it s not enough to rely on hearsay the way it is in federal