called fact. fact was funded by, we don t know who, dark money donors only, he was the only employee. fact existed for the sole purpose of giving matt whitaker an affiliation to put under his name when he went on cable news shows and right wing talk radio to be a hillary clinton and mueller pundit. his extensive record of criticism and attacks on the mueller investigation, the president has now put him in charge of. the special counsel s investigation led by robert mueller into russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and the question of whether the trump campaign colluded in that attack. mr. whitaker has just been installed directly by president trump to oversee that investigation. mr. whitaker quite clearly is a person who has already made up his mind about the key questions at the heart of that investigation. i think we would know from was a smoking gun, or any gun,
told by sources that the president was tired of don mcgahn. he had a very, very successful tenure as the white house counsel, stacking the courts with conservative judges. he was so instrumental in that, just in all the federal court appointments. it was just a bad relationship towards the end, obviously. i wonder if he s going to hawaii or some tropical vacation. no joking matter, this is bizarre. bob mueller is now asking the fbi to investigate what looks to be a coordinated smear campaign against him, paying women off to lie? right, exactly. the website, a conservative website, posted these documents that seemed to indicate there was these allegations against robert mueller of sexual assault. it was all apparently at least a hoax attempt against we don t
do your point, very difficult in terms of complexity of investigation because you re looking at multiple crime scenes in multiple states and no sustained coherence between suspected targets. monday, today, the latest attacks, five and six. it doesn t seem to be in alignment of ideological perspective that that would inform the discussion relative to emotive. we understand the means, we understand the opportunity but the motive remains very ambiguous. harris: we don t know who, is what i learned from you time and time again. yes indeed. you are an excellent student, harris. it s very difficult to connect the dots. harris: let s talk about the fact that none of these devices have detonated on its own, remotely as far as we know, i don t even know if they ve had that capability because
investigation of dr. ford, husband and therapist and whoever else can could company ob rate the lie depeck tore and want the f.b.i. to interrogate judge kavanaugh, the lookout who says it didn t happen and anybody else who can corroborate judge kavanaugh s side. i don t think that will happen. i think monday we ll hear from dr. ford and examined by all members of the committee and we ll hear from judge kavanaugh and examined by all members of the committee. the senate rules permit one corroborating witness for each side. we don t know who, if any, those people will be. when this happened in 1991, talking about anita hill and clarence thomas, professor hill was effectively demolished by a brilliant, bigtering and fierce cross examination conducted by
tickets. yankee baseball tickets. apparently never claimed and that manafort sort of earmarked for a trump. we don t know who. why is this of note? it is an interesting piece in that this is the first time to your point that the name trump whether it s donald trump the president, don jr., eric trump, ivanka, we don t know but it s come up in the trial so it s a couple things. it illustrates the fact that, yes, it does come up through the mueller probe and the reason he is on trial right now. what was uncovered by bob mueller and all of the tweets are right in the sense of not directly related to the 2016 campaign and what paul manafort did there. it does suggest, however, he did have an interaction. this is in 2013. that note with trump and yankees tickets. trump world. prior to the trump campaign of april 2016. okay. chris, now i look at courtroom