we think she s just lying? i m not going to speak to that. you know hanna anderson, you know the family well. i do. do you believe there is a reason why she wouldn t be telling the truth? do you think i know the hanna anderson that i saw a few nights ago on the tv is certainly not the girl that stayed in my home three weeks prior to them disappearing. what do you mean? do what do you mean? i remember very vividly telling my brother, she s trouble. she s going i said, you need to watch out for that one, she s trouble. she was you know, came into my home, was very gracious. didn t say thank you once. she had on extremely heavy eye makeup, just wasn t wasn t the just didn t strike me as
do you think i know the hanna anderson that i saw a few nights ago on the tv is certainly not the girl that stayed in my home three weeks prior to them disappearing. what do you mean? do what do you mean? i remember very vividly telling my brother, she s trouble. she s going i said, you need to watch out for that one, she s trouble. she was you know, came into my home, was very gracious. didn t say thank you once. she had on extremely heavy eye makeup, just wasn t wasn t the just didn t strike me as a i don t know. i don t want to bash anyone. it certainly not my intent. so if you believe she was troubled, then it may well be that your brother became infatuated with her
i m not going to speak to that. you know hanna anderson, you know the family well. i do. do you believe there is a reason why she wouldn t be telling the truth? do you think i know the hanna anderson that i saw a few nights ago on the tv is certainly not the girl that stayed in my home three weeks prior to them disappearing. what do you mean? do what do you mean? i remember very vividly telling my brother, she s trouble. she s going i said, you need to watch out for that one, she s trouble. she was you know, came into my home, was very gracious. didn t say thank you once. she had on extremely heavy eye makeup, just wasn t wasn t the just didn t strike me as
hand, and gaining back territories that up to now the rebels have been strongholding for want of a better word, now was the time to do it, because he had been hoping the president that assad would fall under the whole weight of this. that does not appear to be the case. that wasn t the stated reason. that is not the reason they gave. they were saying because of the chemical weapons. so they have to make up their mind whether they want to have this excuse neil: do you support, as do many republicans, this is more than an humanitarian effort with 0,000 or so at a minimum killed in the last year, that now is the time, this is the wright thing, political timing not withstanding. you asked two different questions can the right time or right thing. but the timing is what we re talking about. i think neil: you argue better late than never, for whatever reason. yeah, but the the president knows that. here s the other thing. if this were june 2014, and the
robbery with a gun, he was vielth parole, why was he out on the street? that is the real question today, ash leak. and without question, i think that is something that will be parced and investigated, but at the same, deb, you cannot investigate what happened in andrea s house, so at this point with the despond ent, what are the police saying about what they re going to do about this. reporter: well, clearly now, this is all under investigation because the firearm was discharged. so they always look at it. it was used. two people died, so clearly, it s under investigation. but right now, police are saying the officer followed protocol t. call came in. it was not a hostage situation, it was a robbery. so the response was different. that, too, will be uninvestigation. why wasn t the tactical team that usually deals with the hostage swigs, successfully,