AssassInatIon attempt agaInst Donald Trump Last Sunday at hIs FlorIda Golf Club Is appallIng and do despIcable. It Is the second straIght faIlure by the Secret ServIce whIch dId not secure the Golf Course and the 58yearold convIcted felon mIght well have succeeded If a sharpeyed Agent Hadnt spotted the tIp of hIs gun through I the fence and opened fIre. ThIs Is sImply unacceptable, and trumps securIty must be Increased. But It Is there that any MedIa Con Consensus breaks down. Trump reacted by tellIng Fox News dIgItal he belIeves the rhetorIc of bIden and harrIs, and he acted on It. TheIr rhetorIc Is causIng me to be shot at. Let me just number In and say jump In and says anyone who trIes to kIll a candIdate or does a Mass ShootIng Is by defInItIon crazy. But these two two attempts In two months are fuelIng a fIrestorm of debate wIth the MedIas Role Front and center about whether Kamala HarrIs SIde or the Trump SIde Is more responsIble for fosterIng a clImate of vIolence. Donald trumps
you that the dossier was told envelopment to the fisa wind. a lot of people focus on the dossier, on fisa, carter page, and they say there wasn t spying on the campaign, at the beginning, this is all about what russia was doing. now republicans are trying to claim that the dossier to getting the fisa, the surveillance warrant, for carter page. but thesu democrat s memo cleary shows it wasn t the key, there was more into the information that they have. given the earlier version of the redacted fisa authorization, to be enough information to indicate the dossier was not used as the primary source. tucker: ouch. that hasn t aged well, has it? everything you just saw turned out to be false if not outright lying. t there is no debate about it, and we know now it was wrong. has cnn retracted it, or apologized? that s a rhetorical question!
wasn t spying on him and we happened to go to breakfast in the same place and he was with his family members and there is a geniality there. they say has the hardest part of these politics to make with people you don t know and up on the stage and getting into it. he did not thrive in the last debate. what do you do different tonight? well, look, we approach tonight the way we approach every day he s out there on the trail. our job is to introduce beto to the american people. the reality is there is still 40% of the american people that don t know who he is so we have a shot to make the case directly to the american people, just like he does out on the trail. this is who we are and who we stand for and these are the kind of issues that he ll focus on and fight for and that is what we owe the american people tonight same as if on the trail. you have to fit the strategy to the fight. so tonight it is about a little bit of introduction of course, but differentiation. yeah. you cou
tucker: back in may of 2017, john brennan insisted that the steele dossier had no bearing on the behavior during the 2016 election. do you know who commissioned this steele dossier? i don t. did the cia rely on it? no. why not? because we didn t. it wasn t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. it was not in any way used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment that was done. tucker: that s such a lie and we know it s a lie. just as when brennan claimed american drones never killed civilians, lying. lying intentionally and knew he was lying. other officials later said they knew it was critical to the intention committee action including their decision to spy on a wholly innocent american citizen called carter page. carter paige joins us tonight on our set. thank you for coming on. what s your when you see that what s your reaction?
and get away with it that we are going to give preference to people based children based purely on their skin color to some and discriminate against others purely based on their skin color? isn t that what we didn t like about the jim crow south that attitude. we developed orwellian situation where we tried to escape this sort of bias in favor of one race versus another. now it s being done in the name of racial equity. so inequality equals equality if you follow that. this is really, it makes no logical sense. as i say i think it s truly orwellian. tucker: last question maybe should have been my first question. is there any evidence that any of this helps kids learn, that it produces better outcomes that it helps children? i don t think so. i think it all it does sen gauge in racial obsession. racial being counted and creates a situation of racial bias. we are going to assume you are a racist. got racial bias that other person is a racist. how about implicit decency. assume