difference. that is what we had in watergate. well, in this case all we have is a rant in the first hearing. it s a democratic rant. you see no evidence? you see this as just a rant, jim? no, i m talking about the judiciary committee. that first judiciary committee hearing was a joke. flat out. i m not sure what you mean but here we have a real one. they couldn t ask a question. they couldn t ask a question. now we re going to come back after they ve done all their work in the basement in secret it wasn t in secret. come to the party, now you can ask questions. and why wouldn t they try to try to i would say we re not playing in this one. because you don t like how it was before? here s your chance to tell the american people and participate in a process where everyone s looking and you want to say we don t like how it was before? there s not going to be 218 democrats that are going to vote for impeachment here. we have to look at the 31 seats where the pres
i m the judge, jimmy. you got lewandowsky. you got ken starr that he got to do his whole report. is this fair, or is this not compared to them? oh, yeah. more so. starr did it all in secret, and then he went to the senate. by the way, lewandowsky, yeah, he was high-handed and arrogant when he was talking to the congressmen, but when barry burke, a good lawyer, questioned him, he was quickly reduced to showing he was a liar. that s what it would be like in the house. you d have competent, professional counsel questioning. that makes a big difference. that is what we had in watergate. so, you know in this case all we have is a rant in the first hearing. that s all we have is a democratic rant. you see no evidence? you say this is just a rant, jim? that first judiciary committee hearing was a joke, flat out. i m not sure what you mean. but here we have a real one. they couldn t ask a question, and now we re going to come back
after they ve done all their work in the basement in secret, and now it wasn t in secret. hey, come to the party. now you can ask questions. and why wouldn t they? why wouldn t they try to i would say we re not playing in this one. because it was you don t like how it was before? here s your chance to tell the american people and participate in a process where everyone s looking, and you want to say, we don t like how it was before? there s not going to be 218 democrats that are going to vote for impeachment here. the ones we have to look at are those 31 seats where the president won, and we have democrats sitting in those congressional seats. those are the ones that everybody s going to be watching in these votes. folks like jeff van drew in new jersey. that s true. and conor lamb here in pennsylvania. those are going what about the american people, jim? what about the 50% of the population? [ overlapping voices ] jimmy, hold on a second. let s get some c