we have security considerations that are bigger than any crime. when you put it like, that i think you raise such an important point. i think viewers know exactly what you re talking about because the notion that someone committed felony acts is different from whether they are a clear and present danger with the power that they have. you can roughly analogyize to when investigators sometimes find out information that might not be chargeable yet, but poses the kind of threat that they call in and october on. this is very different if the threat, as andy mccabe argued is coming from inside the government, inside the white house, and that hasn t been proven yet. but then walk us through, david, how that would work in the eyes of bob mueller, that he would find something that was bad enough that wasn t chargeable. how would he want to get to it the house? again, i ve been washing this for two years. bob mueller being such a by the book person and doing the right thing as a prosecutor.
chargeable. it s possible that there may be a statement or two to congress that is chargeable as a crime. as viewers may not know, lying to congress is a crime. but you have to prove that he knowingly did so. so i imagine the defense is going to be from jeff sessions and his team is that he didn t remember at the time. you know, he miss remembered, et cetera. those cases can be more challenging to prove than you think, and i certainly do think that the attorney general is doing his very best to expertly avoid, you know, being charged with a crime. so, laura, should sessions come back to correct his testimony to congress? well, i mean, if they ll have him, and i m sure they ll welcome it. however, it would put him into greater legal jeopardy for this reason. selective amnesia really does breed suspicion and increased scrutiny. part of the role for the fbi and any investigator worth their chaps is to have the hairs on the back of their neck raised whenever somebody tries to
realistically much of what he said sounded evasive but wasn t chargeable. it s possible that there may be a statement or two to congress that is chargeable as a crime. as viewers may not know, lying to congress is a crime. but you have to prove that he knowingly did so. so i imagine the defense is going to be from jeff sessions and his team is that he didn t remember at the time. you know, he misremembered, et cetera. those cases can be more challenging to prove than you think, and i certainly do think that the attorney general is doing his very best to expertly avoid, you know, being charged with a crime. so, laura, should sessions come back to correct his testimony to congress? well, i mean, if they ll have him, and i m sure they ll welcome it. however, it would put him into greater legal jeopardy for this reason. selective amnesia really does breed suspicion and increased scrutiny. part of the role for the fbi and any investigator worth their