building here? is it a pleasure to cook in here? building here? is it a pleasure to cook in here? it s - building here? is it a pleasure to cook in here? it sjust- to cook in here? it s ust wonderful. i to cook in here? it s ust wonderful. ii to cook in here? it s ust wonderful. ithinkh to cook in here? it sjust wonderful. i think good l wonderful. i think good architecture makes you better at whatever you re doing. it makes me show up more. you feel happy being in this space. you can see that. when i cook, i m quite manic about cleaning up as i go along. unlike my husband who leaves a minor nuclear disaster. that s me. how can you cook like that? i throw everything in the sink and we work our way through it. you have so many cook books. i have a few. you have so many cook books. i have a few i have a few. ..i collect cook books, i have a few. ..i collect cook books, but i have a few. ..i collect cook books, but not i have a few. ..i collect cook books, but not on
the case seems to hinge a lot on trump employee 4. the key conversation about the boss wants this deleted, that s just a verbal conversation. and so a lot is riding on the word of the trump employee 4. the case against former president trump is stronger. there s of course the recording where he says i could have declassified this and so forth. and there s a lot more evidence. sure. but i m saying with these two walt nauta and de oliveira, can t they say i was moving boxes because i wanted to clear out the storage room, or the boss isn t donald trump? how strong a case against them? i think the case is is modest against them. it is not as strong as the case against former president trump. the issue is saying, well, i wasn t doing it for he was their boss. in the end there s not an intermediate boss referenced in the superseding indictment, so there would be a defense, but it ultimately dd not make sense to a jury. harry, i read your notes and you said this is the most
hinge a lot on trump employee 4. the key conversation about the boss wants these deleted, that s just a verbal conversation. so a lot is riding on the word of trump employee 4. the case against former president trump is stronger. there s the recording where he says, i could have declassified this and so forth, and there s a lot more evidence. sure. but i m saying with these two, walt nauta and carlos de oliveira, can t they fall on their sword and say, i was just cleaning up. i was moving boxes because i wanted to clear out the storage room. the boss isn t donald trump. how strong is the case against them? i think the case is is modest against them. it is not as strong as the case against former president trump. the issue is saying, well, i wasn t doing it for president trump. he was their boss in the end. there s not an intermediate boss referenced in the superseding indictment. there would be a defense, but it ultimately could just not make sense to a jury. harry, you said th
when you set out to try to get your day in court here. did things go the way that you thought they would? were they harder than you thought they would be or were you more prepared for how they were going to go than you expected? how did it match up with your expectations and how you had prepared? i was ignorant. i had never sued anybody. i had never even been in a courtroom. it was totally but robby caplan, who i heard someone you might know say when the history of this era is written, there will be multiple chapters about robby caplan. she and this brilliant team of lawyers had me so prepared, had me unbelievably prepared. i went in because i was so ignorant, confident. it was like getting hit by a board when mr. tacopina did my cross examination but i really wasn t doing it for myself.
she and this brilliant team of lawyers had miso prepared. had me unbelievably prepared. i went in because i was so ignorant, confident. it was like getting hit by board when mr. tacopina did my cross-examination. but i wasn t doing it for myself. i was doing it for the women in the country. and i i got very little sleep. [inaudible] every day was exciting. it s an incredible feeling to feel the waves across the country behind us. and at the end when i told what happened, i was heard, i was heard in federal court.