make that admission but torture does remain a flash point here, these enhanced interrogation techniques. let s remember, president trump while on the campaign trail talked about how he felt like it would work, that some tactics like waterboarding wouldn t go far enough and told stories about how in the past acts of alleged terror or alleged torture to terror suspects, to war prisoners and he advocated the united states get back to that. now after taking office he says in conversation with defense secretary mattis he rised that perhaps that didn t work and he softened his stance but yesterday in the white house briefing, white house press secretary sarah sanders was asked if the president still believed that enhanced interrogation techniques were effective and needed and she didn t really answer. i know what the answer is. she sort of suggested she hadn t brought it up with him but as we know as close watchers of the sarah sanders daily press briefing, that s her go to when she do
a rule of war prisoners were not murdered because. the sentence was three and a half years of hard labor for an answer and eighteen months in prison for me we didn t serve out our sentences and after a while we were sent to auschwitz separately is home it s hard to believe but i was required to sign a document saying that i was going to auschwitz voluntarily. because by then people were aware of what was going on at auschwitz but no one wanted to believe it . but it was true of weeks on so when i arrived in auschwitz of this i try to prepare for the worst the words it was an almost impossible task and this . but events took a different turn and i was not sent to auschwitz on one of the mass transports or choose who was sentenced to live or die on arrival at their gramma pressure i arrived in auschwitz as a convicted criminal and it was better to be a criminal than
there and mr. trump was elected on saying he was going to crack down on outsideers and make the u.s. safe. what do you think the upshot of having this argument with the australian prime minister would be. he s not making the united states safe. just like the muslim ban does not make it safe because it s isis material for jihadists and gives other people like in iraq war fighting with him to defeat isis and he puts our soldiers in jeopardy and it s against one of the best allies and it s not what you should do. i don t think he got elected on that. refugees are not war prisoners and they certainly can be better and should be better. president obama was vetted and our country vetted everybody that s coming in from syria at least two years with intense vetting, extreme vetting, huge vetting. what is going on?
that you you can modify using psychological tests that can help prevent this phenomenon. do you think the american sect is doing enough to encourage young americans in this ount tri not to follow that path? of course not. it means you come to radical teaching and reinterpret it and have clarity about certain principles like stoning women to death, like declaring jihad and taking their women as war prisoners. if there is no clear stand against this principle, then, we re in trouble. i don t see the religious leaders in the muslim world taking a clear stand. all through the middle east
that you you can modify using psychological tests that can help prevent this phenomenon. do you think the american sect is doing enough to encourage young americans in this ount tri not to follow that path? of course not. it means you come to radical teaching and reinterpret it and have clarity about certain principles like stoning women to death, like declaring jihad and taking their women as war prisoners. if there is no clear stand against this principle, then, we re in trouble. i don t see the religious leaders in the muslim world taking a clear stand.