War Decision News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Quy hoạch đô thị ven sông Hồng trong quy hoạch chung Thủ đô Hà Nội
baophapluat.vn - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from baophapluat.vn Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
walking away from the treaty. to your point, julie, it s really aimed at china. because china, the threat to china is in the south china sea. the ranges that a war would be initiated is somewhere between 500 miles off the coast to about 1200 miles off the coast. the only way to achieve those ranges is to use the very missiles and rockets that are optimized to fire at those ranges. so this is a conventional war decision. it s aimed at china and it s not intended to be aimed at russia, julie. julie: i want to ask you if you believe president trump has responded to the latest missile tests by north korea on twitter. i want to know your reaction to this, saying that these missile tests are not a violation of our singapore agreement. discussionf short-range missiles when we shook hands. there may be a united nation s violation but chairman kim does not want to disappoint with a
stories they wanted to have because they wanted to invade iraq. so it s one thing to look at the fact that they don t have national security experience. it s the other thing to admit the fact that they have a number of people who said to hell with that we re going to go after saddam hussein and finish the gulf war that we didn t finish before. you were on the way to the white house until voters got in the way. think about that, though. you re in the oval office. and you know you know the history. they ve been wrong a lot. they didn t tell the president that pakistan was developing a nuclear bomb. would have been pretty important to know. they never predicted that the soviet union was going to collapse. so you know all these mistakes they ve made. now they re presenting with you with possibly a war decision based on intelligence. i can tell you how i came out against the war. i supported the previous wars
because they wanted to invade iraq. so it s one thing to look at the fact that they don t have national security experience. it s the other thing to admit the fact that they have a number of people who said to hell with that, we re going to go after saddam hussein and finish the gulf war that we didn t finish before. you were on the way to the white house until voters got in the way. think about that, though. you re in the oval office. and you know, you know the history. they ve been wrong a lot. they didn t tell the president that pakistan was developing a nuclear bomb. would have been pretty important to know. they never predicted that the soviet union was going to collapse. so you know all these mistakes they ve made. now they re presenting with you with possibly a war decision based on intelligence. i can tell you how i came out against the war.
earlier that acknowledged that i should haste top add that presidents rarely read national intelligence reports. this was pretty important. this was right on the topic that was the main basis for selling the war decision. couldn t you argue, to play devil s advocate, that the cia should still, even if the policy makers had preconceived notion, even if the cabinet members came in sayering with going to go aftered is sadd dam hussein and looking for a justification, argue that the cia should have been more careful in wait it vetted that intelligence estimate to avoid giving them any paper justification for it? absolutely. and the silverman-robb commission you can the white house commission that looked into intelligence work on weapons of mass destruction overall did a very good job. they missed the poll lit tidsization aspect of it the most part, they had good things to same we have to point to out that when we go beyond the weapons of mass destruction to the issue of terrorist c
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.