but it s not clear if that message will resonate with republicans. senate republicans are delaying the bill, hoping to secure tougher policies on the us mexico border to curb immigration in exchange for international aid. the us military aid package that s stalled would include $61 billion for ukraine as part of a larger package. congress has approved more than $111 billion since the war began, but the biden administration is warning that money is running out as the war in ukraine ticks closer to its two year mark. our correspondentjess parker has the view from kyiv. he s here on a rescue mission to liberate billions of dollars in defence aid for ukraine, money that s become ensnared in arguments amongst us lawmakers. overnight, a fresh wave of russian missile strikes crushed buildings in kyiv and blew craters in the earth. ukraine s war is with russia, but officials must battle sceptics in the west who ask, what s the endgame? after ukraine s faltering counteroffensive. i
he s there for two days, and the visit is aimed at strengthening ties with its southern neighbour. china is already vietnam s biggest investor. this year, registered investment from mainland china and hong kong combined doubled to more than $8 billion. that s compared to 2022 when pandemic restrictions were still in place in china. but with the us pushing to grow its influence in the region, beijing is also clinging to deepen relations with hanoi even further. raji biswas from s&p global market intelligence describes what s at stake for both countries. i think it s very much reflecting the importance of vietnam for china economically and of course it s an important neighbour as well. so, the political relationship, i think that will be important in terms of president xi s visit to strengthen bilateral ties further. but also, vietnam has become increasingly important in its own right as an export market for china. it s now the fifth largest export market for china and it s gro
covid-i9 that s compared to 2022 when covid i9 restrictions were still in place in china. and alice describes what s at stake for both countries. i alice describes what s at stake for both countries. for both countries. i think it s very for both countries. i think it s very much for both countries. i think it s very much reflecting i for both countries. i think. it s very much reflecting the importance of the naarm for china economically and of course it s an important neighbour as well. and so, the political relationship will be important in terms of the president strengthening bilateral ties further. and vietnam has become increasingly important in its own right as an export for china and is now the fifth largest export market for china and growing tremendously over the last 25 years as vietnam has become more important as a manufacturing hub for other countries. so enhancing economic ties is going to be very much the front and centre for xijinping s visit. the young
emissions, but makes no direct reference to phasing out fossil fuels, which had been in an earlier draft. the eu is threatening to walk out. a representative of small island states says it would be like signing their death certificate. our climate editor, justin rowlatt, has the latest. when the new draft was released, there was confusion. negotiators and journalists scrolled through the pages. the realisation slowly dawning that the agreement had changed. a landmark deal to get rid of the fossil fuels responsible for climate change had seemed within reach. now it appeared to be being snatched away. eamon ryan is one of the eu s lead climate negotiators. if the text doesn t change, will you walk away from the deal? this text will not be acceptable. would you walk away? if this doesn t change, it will not be accepted as a text. so what went wrong? a group of oil producing nations led by saudi arabia had openly opposed the deal. they said there wasn t enough to compensate for t
victory is. this is a blow to google in terms victory is. this is a blow to google in terms of- victory is. this is a blow to | google in terms of fighting epic. this is really about ultimately developers and the ability that they are giving them to charge where they can t really go outside of the actual ecosystem of google. essentially, charging google as a monopoly here. that is what the court case was about. this is a loss, they will fight it, but it is definitely a gutter punch. but it is definitely a gutter unch. , . ., ., but it is definitely a gutter unch. ., ., but it is definitely a gutter unch. h. ., ., punch. epic also had a case auainst punch. epic also had a case against apple punch. epic also had a case against apple which - punch. epic also had a case against apple which they i punch. epic also had a case - against apple which they didn t win. why they managed win against google or alphabet but not against apple? are against google or alphabet but not again