in the evening, operating from about 730 until 630 in the evening, so operating from about 730 until 630 in the evening, so the operating from about 730 until 630 in the evening, so the one - operating from about 730 until 630 in the evening, so the one thing. in the evening, so the one thing they in the evening, so the one thing they must in the evening, so the one thing they must do in the evening, so the one thing they must do is in the evening, so the one thing they must do is make in the evening, so the one thing they must do is make sure - in the evening, so the one thing they must do is make sure thatl in the evening, so the one thing - they must do is make sure that they -et they must do is make sure that they get a they must do is make sure that they get a train they must do is make sure that they get a train that they must do is make sure that they get a train that terminates - they must do is make sure that they get a train that terminates by - they must do
assault on language. that s one of the first thingsou you said. what is what do you mean by that? so let s take for example,or e pregnant people. we re seeing a lot people, including members of the united states congress usinge language like pregnant people now everyry human being knows that only women can get pregnant, but for some reason we re seeing w a shift in language where people are required socially coerced to say things likeeg pregnant people. now i m concerned because i think it s very easy for conservatives to brush that off as luneta leftism. and to be clear, it is insane to refer to pregnant people. it s absolutely ridiculousar and we can and should mockett mercilessly. but it would berc a mistake to just dismiss its as lunacyle on the left. yes, onlyft the left understands a the importance of language. i ve always thought this itou would be a mistake to dismiss it as leftist lunacy because it
the worldd is going to be settled in asia. it s going to be over fifty percent of global gdp. europe moving down to 10%. and so i think you re right. i mean the ukraine situation may concern us to some degree, but it s far, far from the most significant thingfr and a fundamental reality is we have to make choices. you talked about the currency, but it s justut as true in the military context. i m just a little bit mesmerized by this question that it is it is patriotic to support ukraine. i mean toal speak for myself.i i have no allegiance to either one . i don t have a deep interest actually in either one . no connection whatsoever. don t speak the language. never. but why is it axiomatic that supporting ukraine is your duty as an american citizen? what does that come from? you know, well, it s not t axiomatic. i mean, i think it s been a problem or product of t the last generation of hubris,he the neo conservative dominance and essentially the getting disconnected from regular ameri
granting opportunities for global news that matters d. w. minds. welcome to the but is the game here for a decent. place to talk about a. free that s a. shift special digital warriors women using social media to help change the world. today go ahead core pushes for peace between pakistan and india. i fight for peace because i understand the consequences for them and stand upright if someone has to pay for war and. the people who have lost their family will never