clinton on november 18th, 1998, and then clinton s attorney got to question him in the committee itself. it s unclear, sean, it president trump s counsel with the opportunity to pose similar questions in this scenario. back to you. sean: chad in washington, thank you. this is one more dirty political tactic to smear the president of the kind of legal purgatory, if you will, or democrats can pretend they are holding an official proceeding without giving any rights to the president or republicans they look at your screen. if these were the rules during bill clinton s impeachment can newt gingrich was the speaker of the house, the house openly debated, they held an official vote, and the president had the ability to call witnesses. his attorneys did. submit evidence, build a case for now the corrupt, compromised schiff, he gets to veto whatever the hell he pretty much wants. he controls the witness list, the, rules, the evidence, and republicans must raise their hand and get permission
unconstitutional show trial, devoid of all due process. it is illegitimate. it s an impeachment coup attempt run by a corrupt, compromised, congenital liar who has been hell-bent on destroying the presidency of donald trump, regardless of truth, logic, common sense, reason, and facts. and i ll break and just moments ago, at least when democrats apparently, is breaking rank. nbc news reporting that new jersey congressman jeff landrieu will likely vote against the impeachment measurea ly s important to note, he is 1 of 31 democrats that represent districts who voted for donald trump in 2016. big development. with more on this on the democrats impeachment nonimpeachment measure, well, fox news capitol hill senior correspondent chad pergram iser with us. chad? good evening, sean beer the resolution today, that is the first official step codifying the impeachment process in the house. this goes to the rules committee tomorrow to prep the resolution for the floor, then expect the
being perceived as impeachment. he said i want to be very careful with my verdict. fox has told moderate democrats are concerned about publicpu interpretation of the resolution. there s a risk for republicans, is also coming this, top republican on the oversight committee, jim jordan of ohio, predicted no g.o.p. defections fieldhouse minority whip steve scalise urged a no vote. republicans from battleground districts could face a choice: vote for the impeachment resolution or break with their colleagues and get a primary challenge, to say nothing of igniting the ire of president trump. also, this impeachment resolution gives great latitude to the house intelligence committee. that s rare in an impeachment investigation. the judiciary committee would ultimately write the articles of impeachment, but they may argue that president from goetz rights to defend himself there are committee meetings. in the last the committee heard from independent counsel ken starr, they heard him make his
call senators, senators can t call the president because of separation of power. in terms of joe biden and hunter biden, yeah, i think somebody definitely means to look into this, and it was about foreign aid, so the scoring w rac foreign relations committee would have jurisdiction on that. we ve never had under the resolution they re going to pass tomorrow, they cannot participate in the intel committee inquiry, soe the president is denied right to counsel, and republicans can t call witnesses without schiff agreeing, so this whole thing is a sham. s sean: do you think, because i believe what i m holding in my hands, this is a phony resolution. this is fake news. his fake fairness. but i believe you are responsible for this. if you put out your petition, your 50 signatures, 50 is a pretty magic s number. now my question is, maybe we