Protect the integrity of our election. If you count the legal votes, i easily win. If you count the illegal votes they can try to steal the election. If you count the votes that came in late. A lot of votes came in late. I already decisively won many critical states including massive victories in florida, iowa, indiana, ohio to name a few. We won these and many other victories despite historic interference from big media, money and tech. Pollsters got it wrong. They were ridiculous, and there was no blue wave like they predicted. They thought there was going to be a blue it. It was false. Wave. Was a big red it has been properly acknowledged by the media. I think they were impressed after the fact. We kept the Senate Despite having twice as many seats to defend as democrats. The much more competitive states we did a fantastic job with the senate. We are proud of what happened. 200 millionlmost dollars on senate races in South Carolina and kentucky alone, hundreds of millions of dollars
Despite the century that has elapsed our constitution still does not recognize or guarantee full protection of the law for women and gender minorities. Hj resolution 79 would bring us one step closer. The resolution removes the previous deadline set for ratifying the e. R. A. And will ensure that recent ratifications by nevada , illinois, in virginia are given full effect. The e. R. A. Offers a basic and fundamental guarantee, the equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex. Thats it. Very simple. In the years since it was passed by overwhelming majorities in the house and senate we have made Great Strides to secure that equality including through existing case law signed under the 14th amendment. The e. R. A. Would enshrine those principles and take the final step of ensuring that laws disadvantaging women and gender minorities are subject to the most rigorous form of constitutional scrutiny. In recent years w
66 in to town and out of town. No worries there. Oo as you lat the beltway flo waway inner loop and outer loop looking good. Thank you. Lets get back to this mornings breaking news. Five people shot overnight in washington, d. C. Four people were shot in southeast d. C. Before that, though, around 11 30 la night, aman was shot in northwest. That shooting was in Columbia Heights on 14th street near harvard street. Tpe man is exed to survive. About 30 minutes later on the other side of the city, four people were shot. News4 molette green is live with more on that case. Good morning. Reporte good morning to you. Quite a violent night in the district. Was we can tell you at this time is that two me are fighting for their lives this morning. Two others who were shot are not suffering f serious o injury. We want to show you what the scene looked like around innocent southeast in the 3900 ock of south capitol street where police had quite an investigation on their hand at this scene. Police a
Doctrine or keep it. Custice roberts well hear argument first this morning in case 221219, relentless versus the department commerce. Mr. Martinez. Or aument of Roman Martinez on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court for too long, chevron has distorted the judicialss and undermined statutory interpretation. It should be overror three reasons. First, chevron violates the constitution. Article iii emwe judges to say what the law is. It requires them to interpret federal statutes using their best and iepdent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reallocates ieretive authority from courts to agenciesanit forces courts to adopt inferior agency constructions that aued for political or policy reasons. In so, chevron blocks judges from serving as faithful agents of congress. It mandates judicial bias and enures agency overreach. And by removing key checks o executive power, it threatens individual liber. Chevron also violates the apa. The most s
Chief Justice Roberts well hear argument first this mni in case 221219, relentless versus the dept of commerce. Mr. Martinez. Oral argument of Roman Martinez on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief justice, and may it please tht for too long, chevron has distorted the dial process and undermined statutory interpretation. It should orruled for three reasons. First, chevron violates the constitution. Articliiempowers judges to say what the law is. It requires them to int federal statutes using their be a independent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reall Interpretive Authority from courts to es, and it forces courts to adopt inferior Agency Construction are issued for political or policy reasons. In doing so, chevron blocks judges from serving as fl agents of congress. It mandates judicial bias and encourages agency overreach. And by removing key ec on executive power, it threatens individuerty. Chevron also violates the apa. The most straighrd reading of section 706 re