is doing his best to soften his image in a new ad, and expect to see a lot more like it, particularly from the house incumbents trying for the promotion. i m running for the u.s. senate, because we need solutions, and washington needs montana common sense. finally, of course, there are at least a half dozen republican senate incumbents facing primary challenges that could at the very least batter them, drain them of war chests heading into the general election. over the weekend, in what could be a damaging twist for three-term kansas senator pat roberts, the new york times revealed he does not have a home address in kansas. the house on a country club golf course in dodge city that he lists as his voting address belongs to two longtime supporters that he pays rent to and stays with when he is in town. roberts faces a long shot tea party challenge from wolf, who has seized on the story to argue roberts is out of touch with his kansas roots. of course, the residency issue
when it comes to the roberts story, again, they said they didn t want to be lugar, they seemed concerned what was interesting about the reporting, this seems to be an issue they were worried about. yeah, what s fascinating is they re now saying he doesn t, in fact, own a property in dodge city. but that was the property that he has, according to his senate financial forms, listed as a rental income, meaning that someone has been living there for the last ten years. right. and they recognized that would be a problem for them in this campaign with the tee party challenger, so last fall he got a new driver s license and changed his voting address to the home of ross, longtime friends, donors of his in dodge city. so it s fascinating that now they re going back to the place that he rents out to say that so they thought that s his residence they thought the residency issue [ overlapping speakers ] they thought they were
to remember explanatory story that makes this all go away. i m guessing that s what they ll do. mr. romney has the same campaign spokesman now that he had the last time this sort of controversy swirled around him. that was when he was running for governor of massachusetts in 2002. the massachusetts residency requirements for voting are poetic. your voting address must be where you dwell and must be the center of your domestic, social and civil life. that s for voting. the residency requirements if you want to run for governor in massachusetts, those requirements are different. those requirements are that you must have lived in the state for seven consecutive years before running. mitt romney ran for governor of massachusetts in 1992. from 1999 to 2001 he lived in utah. his house in park city, utah, was taxed as his primary residence. he lived in utah. he paid $54,000 less in property taxes than he would have paid had he been a resident some place else. say massachusetts. if he was just
now that these questions are being raised about mitt romney as he runs for president, i suspect his campaign will handle this very well. they ll come up with a very easy to remember explanatory story that makes this all go away. i m guessing that s what they ll do. mr. romney has the same campaign spokesman now that he had the last time this sort of controversy swirled around him. that was when he was running for governor of massachusetts in 2002. the massachusetts residency requirements for voting are poetic. your voting address must be where you dwell and must be the center of your domestic, social and civil life. that s for voting. the residency requirements if you want to run for governor in massachusetts, those requirements are different. those requirements are that you must have lived in the state for seven consecutive years before running. mitt romney ran for governor of massachusetts in 1992. from 1999 to 2001 he lived in utah. his house in park city, utah, was taxed as his pri
being raised about mitt romney as he runs for president, i suspect his campaign will handle this very well. they ll come up with a very easy to remember explanatory story that makes this all go away. i m guessing that s what they ll do. mr. romney has the same campaign spokesman now that he had the last time this sort of controversy swirled around him. that was when he was running for governor of massachusetts in 2002. the massachusetts residency requirements for voting are poetic. your voting address must be where you dwell and must be the center of your domestic, social and civil life. that s for voting. the residency requirements if you want to run for governor in massachusetts, those requirements are different. those requirements are that you must have lived in the state for seven consecutive years before running. mitt romney ran for governor of massachusetts in 1992. from 1999 to 2001 he lived in utah. his house in park city, utah, was taxed as his primary residence. he lived in u