polansk. tell us about this, this was about attorney/client privilege but if there s criminality, the pr privilege doesn t exist. reporter: right. john eastman was trying to keep these emails away from the committee and anyone else who wanted them. this is the second time the judge found these emails should be released, they can t be protected because of a furtherance of a fraud, it s called a crime fraud exception. this is a monumental finding from a federal judge. it does two things, potentially very quickly. right now eastman is in a position these emails could be released to the house select committee. previously they got emails right around january 6th. this is a wider portfolio, the entire month of december 2020 leading up. so a lot of additional context the house may not have had before. and the second thing it does, it has a federal judge on paper looking at documents that could potential evidence and saying what they actually mean. and his finding is that these ema
actual emails but described them. one set of emails the judge said president trump filed certain lawsuits not to obtain legal relief but to disrupt or delay the january 6th congressional proceedings through the courts. keep that in mind, disrupt or delay. the other badge the judge described, he said president trump knew the specific number of voter frauds were wronged but continued to tout those numbers to the public. the court, that s potentially a crime. the most important thing is president trump knew. i m going to star this here. this is a big deal in terms of so much of what we ve been hearing for the last year. so what s the relevance of all of this when we talk about possible prosecutions going forward? this judge before had ruled that it was more likely than not that trump was involved in two crimes, obstruction of an official proceeding. we talked about how one of the goals was to stop or delay the january 6th count.
subpoena. even though he claims voter frauds even though we know and bill barr knows there wasn t any. they report, according to the little politico reveed, which his lawyer sent tuesday to panel s chair, his participation in that meeting is a pab ri indication. karrick s cooperation could be significant as he is the only person who worked on trump s post election legal matters. betsy, this is your great reporting. take us through the two pieces of the kerric story. this certainly looks like an uncomfortable error on the part of the january 6th select committee. and their subpoena letter they sent to kerik they cited bob
don t believe any of the conventional wisdom. the ballots were turned. the polls, they re not counting on anything because there s also possibility of a surprise. back to larry elder and what he s planplanning. it s nice for him to telegraph his game plan if he loses. here he is explaining it. we have lawyers all set up, all ready to file lawsuits. they re going to cheat. we know that. he s already before the ballots are counted saying there s going to be cheating and obviously we have seen the impact those statements from donald trump from had on this country. the violence, the division. what happens in california if larry elds lder loses and makes big stink there s voter frauds. we see all of those lawsuits in 2020 get thrown out too. unless there s some compelling evidence that we re unaware of that elder has come up with, there s no reason to think that
thanks. a new report shows fewer than 200 cases of voter frauds in arizona despite claims of widespread issues. we ll speak with arizona secretary of state next on this revelation and the status on what feels like a forever audit going on there. when technology is easier to use. barriers don t stand a chance. that s why we ll stop at nothing to deliver our technology as-a-service. ugh, these balls are moist. or is that the damp weight of self-awareness you now hold in your hands? yeah (laugh) keep your downstairs dry with gold bond body powder.