it was a surprise that they moved to adjourn. and frankly, the clerk gaveled it so quickly, i m not sure that it prompted any debate. again, you are demonstrating that the clerk holds the gavel to make those decisions and does not have to leave it open for much debate. so, that move very quickly. whether it helps them or hurts them, i don t know. i suppose if we more volts votes, and more failure. but i think eventually they would to adjourn. i have to think that what will happen tomorrow is one of two things. either mccarthy will cut some kind of a deal with these rebellious members of his conference, or they will have several other votes that he will fail and then they will have another adjournment, where they will have to consider nominating someone else. we did see three votes in a row in which hakeem jeffries got the most votes. but this is one of those elections where the person with the most votes doesn t
in this lower parts of the day about the strategies on adjourning or not adjourning. who does it help? will it help kevin mccarthy if they adjourn? will the democrats vote for adjournment in order to help kevin mccarthy? so, is that a surprise motion by tom coal, who is a kevin mccarthy loyalist, that the democrats did not even vote on? it was a voice vote just entirely a republican vote? it was a surprise that they moved to adjourn. and frankly, the clerk gaveled it so quickly, i m not sure that it prompted any debate. again, you are demonstrating that the clerk holds the gavel to make those decisions and does not have to leave it open for much debate. so, that move very quickly. whether it helps them or hurts them, i don t know. i suppose if we more volts votes, and more failure. but i think eventually they would to adjourn. i have to think that what will happen tomorrow is one of two
possibly adjourning sooner rather than later? that has been the talk that s been going on all day, some discussions about delaying it until tomorrow. having allowing those discussions to continue to play out. give more time for those opponents to explicitly say what they want. but the democrats would have to agree to that because they need 218 volts to adjourn the chamber and there s several republicans who won t vote to adjourn because they need support from democrats. democrats have no incentive to did that. they want mccarthy on the floor losing ballot after ballot after ballot. now, 360 may be a point where they decide to adjourn. at the moment it s not their posture. they want mccarthy to go through what s been a painful exercise for him and his allies, but this is a very fluid situation, anderson, this could change pretty rapidly but what is not changing are the vote, mccarthy looks like he s on the way to losing, looks like the same group of member, 12 votes and counting.
now was morality, and i knew it was morality out of shape, because th - that was not a moral war. you still here? napalm, son. nothing else in the world smells like that. i love the smell of napalm in the morning. there was a line i read we teach the boys to drop fire on people, but we won t let them write the word f - on their airplane because it s immoral. i thought, that said it all. morality is what this movie is, but i m going to put 10,000 volts in it and see what i get. and that ends up being the second to the last line of the movie? yeah. we train young men to drop fire on people, but their commanders won t allow them to write [ bleep ] on their airplane because it s obscene.
in seems pretty far-fetched. he was either not being honest with the committee or he was being incredibly negligent in the performance of his job. what have we learned from the probe? the new york times today described this as one of the most significant congressional probes in the modern era, and i think that s partly because of the evidence. lining that up with these four recommended charges today i would note that three of them, the way the draft report is written, the excerpts you ve released suggest three of them are chargeable even had there been no violent insurrection and i m curious if you could walk us through with other detail now that we ve laid out the overview, when did you and your investigation begin to realize that as horrific and terrible as the insurrection crime was, the violent attack on the capitol you were finding according to this new material today multiple other crimes that would be illegal such as impeding the counting of the volts on the