This is an hour and a half. [background noises] [background noises] hello, welcome everyone. We are delighted you are able to join us today for a conversation about recently released National Academy of sciences consensus report called reducing intergenerationaler poverty. My pleasure this morning is to introduce you to the panelists who will be speaking today pit will first year from three people who are coauthors on the report to will be telling you some Key Highlights from the report. I encourage you to read the report theres a lot of detail in their that we will not be able to cover today. And then we will have a broader discussion. Introducing the report shall be greg duncan he is distinguished professor at the university of california irvine. If he has long researched greatlooking childrens early behavior and skills relate to later life outcome. Heat previously, spent 25 years university of michigan working on the income dynamics with director at one point. Hell be joined by harr
Good afternoon the commission will control to order and the secretary will call the roll. Commissioner chow. Present. Commissioner loyce. Present. Commissioner sanchez. Present. Commissioner pating. Present. Approval of the minutes of january 3rd, 2017. The minutes are before you for approval. I heard a motion for approval. Is there a second, please . Second. Are there any corrections . I would like to make one correction, if i could . First i would in the page 5, after the formal report of the director, then i would have a space in between for after the item on the faces for the future, and as you do, you have a paragraph, but it looks like it belongs to the previous topic and i think i might put in there a topic called the tom waddell incident. Or something . Yes. I see, commissioner. I can add a line, too, so it breaks up the space. If you could do that . Then under the last page, page 8, i think the intent that commissioner singer was reporting on item 11, which was the sf general
First i would in the page 5, after the formal report of the director, then i would have a space in between for after the item on the faces for the future, and as you do, you have a paragraph, but it looks like it belongs to the previous topic and i think i might put in there a topic called the tom waddell incident. Or something . Yes. I see, commissioner. I can add a line, too, so it breaks up the space. If you could do that . Then under the last page, page 8, i think the intent that commissioner singer was reporting on item 11, which was the sf general joint Conference Committee report was that they deferred the medical staff report action items, because it was felt there should be a physician to review the medically oriented rather than myself being specifically mentioned there. Oh, sure, im happy to make that change. The issue there being that there were medicallyoriented issues, but no physicians at that time on the j cc from the commission. So i think that would be clearer. Those
First i would in the page 5, after the formal report of the director, then i would have a space in between for after the item on the faces for the future, and as you do, you have a paragraph, but it looks like it belongs to the previous topic and i think i might put in there a topic called the tom waddell incident. Or something . Yes. I see, commissioner. I can add a line, too, so it breaks up the space. If you could do that . Then under the last page, page 8, i think the intent that commissioner singer was reporting on item 11, which was the sf general joint Conference Committee report was that they deferred the medical staff report action items, because it was felt there should be a physician to review the medically oriented rather than myself being specifically mentioned there. Oh, sure, im happy to make that change. The issue there being that there were medicallyoriented issues, but no physicians at that time on the j cc from the commission. So i think that would be clearer. Those
First i would in the page 5, after the formal report of the director, then i would have a space in between for after the item on the faces for the future, and as you do, you have a paragraph, but it looks like it belongs to the previous topic and i think i might put in there a topic called the tom waddell incident. Or something . Yes. I see, commissioner. I can add a line, too, so it breaks up the space. If you could do that . Then under the last page, page 8, i think the intent that commissioner singer was reporting on item 11, which was the sf general joint Conference Committee report was that they deferred the medical staff report action items, because it was felt there should be a physician to review the medically oriented rather than myself being specifically mentioned there. Oh, sure, im happy to make that change. The issue there being that there were medicallyoriented issues, but no physicians at that time on the j cc from the commission. So i think that would be clearer. Those