Governor, thank you very much for being with us. You squeaked home. A bit of a close election. You were not quite at the 60 threshold for a wailing. I am a republican in new jersey. I am just worried right getting over the finish line. It was gratifying. What was striking was to look at the detail of the exit polls. The latino vote, over 25 of the black vote, running against a woman democratic candidate. All in a state where president vote a year of the ago. A lot of questions about the future of the repugnant party. The future of the Republican Party. How did you do it . You do your jobs. I often think people make Political Leadership to consultative. What people expect you to do is do your job. First and foremost. Jersey,s in new republican, democrat, independent, felt as if we had done a job our job. Second thing, if you want to reach out to constituencies that have not normally voted for your party, you cant go six months before your election. We made a concerted effort from the ti
Legislators. Most americans dont know who their state legislators are. There is an anti choice, rightwing majority that is able to do this state a state. About the much backlash against the changes in this country. That whitery clear women are not having enough children. Why the issue the issues go together. The antiimmigration, antibirth control, antiabortion, and so on. We have to take back our state legislature. Citing the example of working moms versus stayathome moms, a questioner asked what are your thoughts on the way women treat each other . If we were ever asked a question that included men, we might give a better answer. [laughter] do we ever ask a man, do you have it all . We need work patterns that allow everyone to work and also have a life and have kids if they want to. Men, to double oh. Men, too. The idea of stayathome moms the language is bananas. Women who work at home work harder than any other class of worker in the United States. Longer hours and no pay. [applause]
Different delays of the Affordable Care act. The enrollment. For 2015 will now start november 2014 instead of the previous planned october date. Delaysouncement of these and what you think about the changes to the Affordable Care act. Here are the numbers. Wall street journal chose this headline to talk about delays. Again, for those delays, we want to get your thoughts on this morning. Phone lines are on the screen. To give you a listing of the major timeline for the Affordable Care act, the october 1 date was when signups began. On november 30 the Obama Administration set a deadline for fixing healthcare. Gov. Come january 1, 2014, coverage begins. Some of the other options in play right now are march 31, enrollment deadline for 2014 coverage. Again, with that in mind, these delays, and Affordable Care act overall, heres jerry from columbus, ohio on our independent line. Caller still above ground in my 85th year. A veteran. Id like to know why the devil does not anybody ever bring ou
Good morning. It is a sixmonth agreement designed to make it more difficult for iran to turn its Nuclear Stockpiles into weapons. In exchange for lifting economic sanctions meant to hurt that country. This deal is being called plus oneby the p5 nations. Others are calling this a bad agreement. Morning november 24. We will begin with your calls and comments in more details on the short term Nuclear Agreement with iran. The area code is 202 in washington dc. Benjamin netanyahu it says israel is not bound by the deal and reserves the right to defend itself. This is a headline this morning om the Los Angeles Times what is the p5 plus one nations from wall street journal this from senator marco rubio, saying this agreement makes a nuclear iran more likely. He went on to say theres now an even more urgent need for congress to increase sanctions until iran completely abandons its enrichment and reprocessing capabilities. Again, those details from wall street journal. A rare address from the w
Hypothetically bizarre things. They could seek to ultimately sell the capital for scrap or disband the expressions of approval or disapproval are not in order of the committee. Im trying to get to a point here. And despite faith, our challenges sometimes in the institution and american people, who would say, that is way off the face. In suggesting that whatever language is necessary, i dont think this congress itss to be bound itself in actions by what the Previous Congress decided as is evidenced by those who wanted to undermine the president S Health Care law. I present Congress Wants to change what a Previous Congress did. I think that only a Congress Might be able to change a future rut or changes in the american with disabilities act. It would have to be signed by a president. Just creating some balance in that is a reality of any future issue is realistic. I largely agree with what you said. If congress decided to amend the ada, it could consider doing that. We would need to reca