Individual patients through 200,000 visits. So also i would be remiss if i didnt say texas as im sure all of you in this room know, this is not Medicaid Expansion state, so, therefore, only children, the elderly and disabled are still eligible for medicaid. We are also a, on the federal run exchange we did not object to a state exchange. Our marketplace and how people are accessing it, they are coming into our clinic, making appointment or walking in. They meet first with a certified application counselor who starts the process by getting them to walk through the consent. This causes a lot of anxiety for some people, and because theyve heard a lot of bad publicity. Declared about identity theft. Theres also been several groups in houston that have been fraudulent groups out collecting information from people, and basically stealing their identity. Theres been a lot of publicity around it. We have to get over some of that anxiety. Then we have to determine the clients knowledge. And thi
And the disabled and the chronic conditions, we have got to do more than just keep them covered, we have got to cover and then at th to the cost curv. David blumenthal at commonwealth has done a famous job explaining this. This is what the states are doing that i think its is reay exciting news. Im going to do another session on this. Reforming the Delivery System and reforming the way that we pay for care in this country. We have to treat Health Care Just like a bunch of economic and the words paying for value that is with medicaid is focused on these days i will stop there and look for questions at the end. Thank you. That is a great start this discussion and now we are going to turn over to daniel skyler who is the director of Exchange Technology and a former director of the technology for Utah Health Insurance exchange which has been in business as long as anybody. His colleagues have been helping a number of states prepare for the implementation, especially the exchanges and we ha
Efficiency as much as any country ever well. Inre are fewer workers chinese manufacturing today than there were 20 years ago. So, success if and when it comes is going to come from various kinds of service work, areas kinds of greater customization. It is a tragedy that on one hand areare saying and you right, i understand why you are saying it that there may not be enough work to do. There areer hand, several million kids in this who profoundly need individual attention and mentoring of a kind they are not close to getting. We do not have a way of bringing the people who want to Work Together with those. I do not think it is traditional government that will do it. I also do not think it will be turning the country into some kind of libertarian paradise. With that, thank you, Larry Summers. We will be coming back to the ceo council in a moment with congressman paul ryan. Personal tweets from members of congress on the iran deal announced last night. Kevin mccarthy says i caution the pr
My point here is that your pragmatism i love. This is not the pugilisms or that is prodigious in washington. It is about solving problems, lowering costs, giving access to Small Business people like you who want to compete with the big boys. When its in my city is that many folks have a hard time keeping employees who could easily go to other companies who have Better Health insurance plans. You probably know people who could go to other companies and get less salary for Better Health insurance is that correct . I think that is one of our positive attributes. The goal here is to make sure we take this variable, which is made Small Businesses get crushed in the past. Call it socialism or whatever you want, the other countries have costs that you internalize. Were not here to score political points. I dont care about the next election, i care about solving the problems. Most people are saying right now fix the thing, which is what youre saying, right . Hickey, who has no jersey connectio
Defendant, even though it now appears that faa fisa amendment acts were used in criminal prosecutions. There was a great story about this by Charlie Savage about the fact that the solicitor general, when he argued to the Supreme Court, represented to the court that fisa amendments act requires removal defendants to receive notice when the government is prosecuting them on the basis of evidence derived from the fisa amendments act. It turns out not to have been the Justice Departments policy. Their policy was to deny defendants notice, even in circumstances in which they were entitled to it under the statute and constitution. They have changed that policy, which is a good. It seems there is a disconnect between the Justice Department and some of the security agencies about what has to be released and what can be done to ensure what you have said. That data needs to be revealed to the defense. I do not think there is a disconnect between the department of justice and the intelligence age