The sessions court, while convicting them, had said that Saibaba and two other accused possessed Naxal literature with the intent and purpose of circulation. Their main aim was to incite the people to resort to violence.
"This court is of prima facie opinion that a detailed scrutiny is required with regard to the impugned judgment since high court has not considered the merits of the case including the gravity of the offence alleged against him," the order said.