is he did it in self-defense. she then is actually helpful to him by suggesting that god would understand, essentially if you did it in some circumstances. that was the theme of two detective who gave extensive testimony today, very supportive. he was always cam am in his demeanor, that s effectively why we recommend charges and why we believe he acted in self-defense. powerful weapons for the defense. very powerful. and in addition, some of the law enforcement personnel were very assertive with him, very aggressive. they were trying to pin him down and now he s probably not going to have to testify, because there s a video re-enactment. there s the audio, there s the video also of him speaking to a law enforcement officer.
rather he seemed to be affected by the fact that he realized that trayvon martin had passed? he seemed affected by that. reporter: one day after the shooting and george zimmerman returned to this neighborhood with lead investigator chris serino to do a video re-enactment. serino later conducted a more aggressive interview, challenging zimmerman on some points. for instance, in the first statement, zimmerman talked about trayvon martin jumping out of bushes to ambush him. in the re-enactment he didn t mention that, but in court, serino s final analysis did you notice anything to bring to the jury s attention today that caused you that concern? no, not that i can articulate, no, sir. reporter: there was also the testimony from dr. hirotaka nakasone, an fbi audio analyst for the defense who was called to the stand by prosecutors, his focus the 911 call where you can hear screaming in the
with lead investigator chris serino to do a video re-enactment. serino later conducted a more aggressive interview, challenging zimmerman on some points. for instance, in the first statement, zimmerman talked about trayvon martin jumping out of bushes to ambush him. in the re-enactment he didn t mention that, but in court, serino s final analysis did you notice anything to bring to the jury s attention today that caused you that concern? no, not that i can articulate, no, sir. reporter: there was also the testimony from dr. nakasone, an fbi audio analyst for the defense who was called to the stand by prosecutors, his focus the 911 call where you can hear screaming in the background. he told jurors it s not possible to determine age or analyze this tape through science dr. nakasone left one possibility wide open. for this particular case,
she then is actually helpful to him by suggesting that god would understand, essentially if you did it in some circumstances. that was the theme of two detective who gave extensive testimony today, very supportive. he was always cam am in his demeanor, that s effectively why we recommend charges and why we believe he acted in self-defense. powerful weapons for the defense. very powerful. and in addition, some of the law enforcement personnel were very assertive with him, very aggressive. they were trying to pin him down and now he s probably not going to have to testify, because there s a video re-enactment. there s the audio, there s the video also of him speaking to a law enforcement officer. he s also laying out his defense through the prosecution witnesses saying, for example,
to mike brooks point, he says for the most part when you look it at the written statement, audio interview, video re-enactment and now this video interrogation fairly consistent. what was your take wereawaytake? i wasn t sure if they were going to play these audio and videotaped statements or where are they going to force him to testify. but it was a sort of a 70/30 chance. i think their point is not only what he said, it s sort of how he said it and some of the terms that he used. for example he referred to trayvon martin as a suspect. that s police parlance. they re trying to say he was a