to mike brooks' point, he says for the most part when you look it at the written statement, audio interview, video re-enactment and now this video interrogation fairly consistent. what was your take wereawaytake? >> i wasn't sure if they were going to play these audio and videotaped statements or where are they going to force him to testify. but it was a sort of a 70/30 chance. i think their point is not only what he said, it's sort of how he said it and some of the terms that he used. for example he referred to trayvon martin as a suspect. that's police parlance. they're trying to say he was a