The mitigation is 2. 5 million over what we anticipated at this point. The chart that we shared with you. This is a chart that we shared with you as sth of mitigation if we stay on average within the estimate. It shows that the remaining reserves would be 15 million [inaudible] and the remaining construction contingency which is addition to the construction contingency and the [inaudible] would be 72 million, 72 and a fraction so right now were off target by 2. 5 million dollars. The assumption is if were within the estimates on the award of the project we would have 50 million in reserves left and 72 million in construction contingency left. So if i may . I guess so youre looking first of all at the sum of the value of the five packages relative to the estimate, but if you look relative to the budget and were working from an approved budget from last year this is these are 50 higher than the budget. Yeah. So thats just one concern that the budget for these items is in the low 30s and
Is and what the bids presented to the board. It shows that the roof top crane is 2. 4 8 million [inaudible] estimates. The temporary facilities 1 million below and elevates 2. 9 seven and escalators [inaudible] and the mitigation is 2. 5 million over what we anticipated at this point. The chart that we shared with you. This is a chart that we shared with you as sth of mitigation if we stay on average within the estimate. It shows that the remaining reserves would be 15 million [inaudible] and the remaining construction contingency which is addition to the construction contingency and the [inaudible] would be 72 million, 72 and a fraction so right now were off target by 2. 5 million dollars. The assumption is if were within the estimates on the award of the project we would have 50 million in reserves left and 72 million in construction contingency left. So if i may . I guess so youre looking first of all at the sum of the value of the five packages relative to the estimate, but if you
The roof top crane is 2. 4 8 million [inaudible] estimates. The temporary facilities 1 million below and elevates 2. 9 seven and escalators [inaudible] and the mitigation is 2. 5 million over what we anticipated at this point. The chart that we shared with you. This is a chart that we shared with you as sth of mitigation if we stay on average within the estimate. It shows that the remaining reserves would be 15 million [inaudible] and the remaining construction contingency which is addition to the construction contingency and the [inaudible] would be 72 million, 72 and a fraction so right now were off target by 2. 5 million dollars. The assumption is if were within the estimates on the award of the project we would have 50 million in reserves left and 72 million in construction contingency left. So if i may . I guess so youre looking first of all at the sum of the value of the five packages relative to the estimate, but if you look relative to the budget and were working from an approv
Although the mitigation plan we now understand includes deferring the rooftop park so if we bring that back into the fold we have less to deal with. Absolutely. We wouldnt bring that back unless we identify new funding for it. I think the team is doing a herculean job of staying on schedule. Were still on schedule. Theyre doing a incredible job mit gagging in this environment. I think the board can be helpful and when applying for grants and with tiger and go to oregon and washington and discover new years for gr and i ask for assistance in tiger and supporting us there and any other grants that we apply for because its going to be needed. I want to clarify the approved budget from last year includes the rooftop park so as far as i am concerned the board hasnt taken action to take that out of the budget so i think staff has to come back with a revised budget or scope absolutely. We need a revised budget to add the elements that we need but in order to keep the project moving we present
Represents an original claim with less than eight issues. I i say an o2o that represents a claim that the veteran submitted after he submitted an original claim. You only get one original code and everything is an input from there. You have use 930 from there and that is rate decisions that were prematurely decided. It doesnt include a rating bundle. So the 930s which the majority of them are claims that were rated prematurely and they are not counted in this inventory of blacklog claims. That is just one example. Anyone else wish to comment . I agree with them. I dont have as much experience with that sort of processing because i worked the rating side but i agree. Question for the panel. Starting with ms. Soto. Can reacting secretary, mr. Gibson, succeed with the current vba leadership or should we hold this current vba leadership accountable and start with new leadership . Can the acting va secretary succeed with this leadership . My answer would have to be i dont know. They have be